Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Comparison of the nodule detection performances of algorithm A and algorithm B.

Leonard Sunwoo (849058)
Young Jae Kim (507440)
Seung Hong Choi (107291)
Kwang-Gi Kim (507439)
Ji Hee Kang (3599615)
Yeonah Kang (4096786)
Yun Jung Bae (2210587)
Roh-Eul Yoo (629165)
Jihang Kim (4096792)
Kyong Joon Lee (4096789)
Seung Hyun Lee (1444051)
Byung Se Choi (4096795)
Cheolkyu Jung (829552)
Chul-Ho Sohn (443534)
Jae Hyoung Kim (2856014)

Publication date

June 2017

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0178265.t002

Abstract

<p>Comparison of the nodule detection performances of algorithm A and algorithm B.</p

Extracted data

Related items

Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported detection methodologies.

Sajid Rauf (5488562)
Yaqeen Ali (5488568)
Sabir Hussain (1332675)
Fakhar Ullah (5488565)
Akhtar Hayat (1389591)

July 2018

<p>Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported dete...

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers of classification categories.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...

Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.

Muhammad Ali Raza Anjum (551489)
Muhammad Mansoor Ahmed (551490)

April 2014

<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...

Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...

Comparison of the localization accuracy of the algorithm (40 experimental means).

Zhengwei Zhang (584229)
He Sun (446247)
Shangbing Gao (5421047)
Shenghua Jin (662923)

June 2018

<p>(a) represents comparison of positive detection rate. (b) shows comparison of negative detection ...

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.

Sajad Mousavi (6672425)
Fatemeh Afghah (6672428)
U. Rajendra Acharya (5909246)

May 2019

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p

Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.

Pren Naidoo (606701)
Rory Dunbar (305942)
Carl Lombard (17685)
Elizabeth du Toit (465823)
Judy Caldwell (342298)
Anne Detjen (606702)
S. Bertel Squire (308149)
Donald A. Enarson (257339)
Nulda Beyers (305944)

March 2016

<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p

Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.

Ngaam J. Cheung (2220550)
Xue-Ming Ding (2220553)
Hong-Bin Shen (195200)

November 2014

<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p

Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.

Khurram Ashfaq Qazi (4984505)
Tabassam Nawaz (4984502)
Zahid Mehmood (4526767)
Muhammad Rashid (2836631)
Hafiz Adnan Habib (2836637)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p

Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.

Daniela Moralli (246631)
Zoia L. Monaco (374490)

February 2013

<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p

Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.

Xiangdong Peng (11216133)
Xiao Zhou (122661)
Huaqiang Zhu (7436468)
Zejun Ke (14070341)
Congcheng Pan (14070344)

November 2022

Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.</p

Comparative scores of our bouton detection algorithm versus EPBscore results.

Cher Bass (4413268)
Pyry Helkkula (4413271)
Vincenzo De Paola (275215)
Claudia Clopath (324706)
Anil Anthony Bharath (4413274)

September 2017

<p>Comparative scores of our bouton detection algorithm versus EPBscore results.</p

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classification algorithms.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...

Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.

Nastaran Yaghoobi Ershadi (4707673)
José Manuel Menéndez (4918951)
David Jiménez (590472)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.</p

Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported detection methodologies.

Sajid Rauf (5488562)
Yaqeen Ali (5488568)
Sabir Hussain (1332675)
Fakhar Ullah (5488565)
Akhtar Hayat (1389591)

July 2018

<p>Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported dete...

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers of classification categories.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...

Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.

Muhammad Ali Raza Anjum (551489)
Muhammad Mansoor Ahmed (551490)

April 2014

<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...

Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the second experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).<...

Comparison of the localization accuracy of the algorithm (40 experimental means).

Zhengwei Zhang (584229)
He Sun (446247)
Shangbing Gao (5421047)
Shenghua Jin (662923)

June 2018

<p>(a) represents comparison of positive detection rate. (b) shows comparison of negative detection ...

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.

Sajad Mousavi (6672425)
Fatemeh Afghah (6672428)
U. Rajendra Acharya (5909246)

May 2019

Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p

Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.

Pren Naidoo (606701)
Rory Dunbar (305942)
Carl Lombard (17685)
Elizabeth du Toit (465823)
Judy Caldwell (342298)
Anne Detjen (606702)
S. Bertel Squire (308149)
Donald A. Enarson (257339)
Nulda Beyers (305944)

March 2016

<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p

Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).

Yan Yan (208529)
Feifei Lee (4406080)
Xueqian Wu (3171489)
Qiu Chen (4406077)

January 2018

<p>Performance comparison of the first experiment (results of our proposed algorithm are in bold).</...

The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.

Ngaam J. Cheung (2220550)
Xue-Ming Ding (2220553)
Hong-Bin Shen (195200)

November 2014

<p>The comparison of computational efficiency of each algorithm on the test functions.</p

Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.

Khurram Ashfaq Qazi (4984505)
Tabassam Nawaz (4984502)
Zahid Mehmood (4526767)
Muhammad Rashid (2836631)
Hafiz Adnan Habib (2836637)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of accuracy rate of different features extracted with classification algorithms.</p

Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.

Daniela Moralli (246631)
Zoia L. Monaco (374490)

February 2013

<p>Comparison of efficiency of simultaneous detection versus standard technique.</p

Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.

Xiangdong Peng (11216133)
Xiao Zhou (122661)
Huaqiang Zhu (7436468)
Zejun Ke (14070341)
Congcheng Pan (14070344)

November 2022

Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.</p

Comparative scores of our bouton detection algorithm versus EPBscore results.

Cher Bass (4413268)
Pyry Helkkula (4413271)
Vincenzo De Paola (275215)
Claudia Clopath (324706)
Anil Anthony Bharath (4413274)

September 2017

<p>Comparative scores of our bouton detection algorithm versus EPBscore results.</p

Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classification algorithms.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

<p>Comparison of the average precision rates, recall rates and F1 values for the different classific...

Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.

Nastaran Yaghoobi Ershadi (4707673)
José Manuel Menéndez (4918951)
David Jiménez (590472)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of detection rate using 3 Methods on KITTI and DETRAC datasets.</p

Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported detection methodologies.

Sajid Rauf (5488562)
Yaqeen Ali (5488568)
Sabir Hussain (1332675)
Fakhar Ullah (5488565)
Akhtar Hayat (1389591)

July 2018

<p>Analytical performance comparison of the purposed method with the recent literature reported dete...

Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers of classification categories.

Jianfang Cao (1881379)
Yanfei Li (3413285)
Yun Tian (411157)

January 2018

<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...

Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.

Muhammad Ali Raza Anjum (551489)
Muhammad Mansoor Ahmed (551490)

April 2014

<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...