<p>Nodes showing significant differences between groups in the nodal degree and nodal local efficiency after FDR corrections. Orange indicates increases in nodal measures, while blue indicates decreases.</p
<p>Sagittal, axial and coronal projections (left-to-right) of nodes for comparisons of node degree i...
<p>Note: and represent nodal global efficiency and degree, respectively. Bold, italic text indicate...
<p><b>Notes:</b> Network nodes showing the strongest between group effects (permutation test; α = 0....
<p>The blue color represented the higher values of regional nodal centralities in healthy controls, ...
<p>Network measures on individual observations as a function of degree between groups on WM load lev...
<p>Significant decreases in the nodal degree of regions from Module III or fronto-parietal network i...
<p>Green dots above indicate significant group difference (<i>p</i><0.05, FDR corrected) and pink do...
<p>Alterations in each of local metrics, including degree (A), betweenness (B), and nodal efficiency...
<p>(A) Differences between the HC and PM groups in subjects' structural networks. The black solid po...
<p>The colorized areas indicated the different cortical thickness between the NC_M1 and NC_M2 groups...
Vertex-wise group differences in the rate of change of cortical thickness in the replication analysi...
<p>First row: NC versus AD, second row: NC versus MCI, third row: MCI versus AD. The sign of the sta...
<p>Between each artist group and the control group, the nodes with significantly different modular a...
<p>(A) 12.5 Hz, (B) 16.6 Hz. The red and blue lines indicate the nodal connection weights in the net...
<p>The node size indicates the number of basic properties with significant group differences. The no...
<p>Sagittal, axial and coronal projections (left-to-right) of nodes for comparisons of node degree i...
<p>Note: and represent nodal global efficiency and degree, respectively. Bold, italic text indicate...
<p><b>Notes:</b> Network nodes showing the strongest between group effects (permutation test; α = 0....
<p>The blue color represented the higher values of regional nodal centralities in healthy controls, ...
<p>Network measures on individual observations as a function of degree between groups on WM load lev...
<p>Significant decreases in the nodal degree of regions from Module III or fronto-parietal network i...
<p>Green dots above indicate significant group difference (<i>p</i><0.05, FDR corrected) and pink do...
<p>Alterations in each of local metrics, including degree (A), betweenness (B), and nodal efficiency...
<p>(A) Differences between the HC and PM groups in subjects' structural networks. The black solid po...
<p>The colorized areas indicated the different cortical thickness between the NC_M1 and NC_M2 groups...
Vertex-wise group differences in the rate of change of cortical thickness in the replication analysi...
<p>First row: NC versus AD, second row: NC versus MCI, third row: MCI versus AD. The sign of the sta...
<p>Between each artist group and the control group, the nodes with significantly different modular a...
<p>(A) 12.5 Hz, (B) 16.6 Hz. The red and blue lines indicate the nodal connection weights in the net...
<p>The node size indicates the number of basic properties with significant group differences. The no...
<p>Sagittal, axial and coronal projections (left-to-right) of nodes for comparisons of node degree i...
<p>Note: and represent nodal global efficiency and degree, respectively. Bold, italic text indicate...
<p><b>Notes:</b> Network nodes showing the strongest between group effects (permutation test; α = 0....
DOI
Add to ORKG