A model of human motor sequence learning explains facilitation and interference effects based on spike-timing dependent plasticity - Fig 4

<p>(A) Experiment results of experiment 2. (Adapted from [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005632#pcbi.1005632.ref025" target="_blank">25</a>]). Acquisition, retention and transfer performance for the experimental and control groups. Note the experimental group practiced S1 on Days 1 and 2 and S2 on Day 3. The S1 control group practiced S1 on Days 1 and 2. The S2 group only practiced S2 for one day. All groups were tested on S1 and S2 (order counter-balanced). (B) Simulation results for [<a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005632#pcbi.1005632.ref025" target="_blank">25</a>]. Same as above, with the difference that training on S1 is twice as long. Note that now the retroactive interference is attenuated, as in the psychophysical experiments.