Dose painting of prostate cancer based on Gleason score correlations with apparent diffusion coefficients

<p><b>Background:</b> Gleason scores for prostate cancer correlates with an increased recurrence risk after radiotherapy (RT). Furthermore, higher Gleason scores correlates with decreasing apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) data from diffusion weighted MRI (DWI-MRI). Based on these observations, we present a formalism for dose painting prescriptions of prostate volumes based on ADC images mapped to Gleason score driven dose-responses.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> The Gleason score driven dose-responses were derived from a learning data set consisting of pre-RT biopsy data and post-RT outcomes for 122 patients treated with a homogeneous dose to the prostate. For a test data set of 18 prostate cancer patients with pre-RT ADC images, we mapped the ADC data to the Gleason driven dose-responses by using probability distributions constructed from published Gleason score correlations with ADC data. We used the Gleason driven dose-responses to optimize dose painting prescriptions that maximize the tumor control probability (TCP) with equal average dose as for the learning sets homogeneous treatment dose.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> The dose painting prescriptions increased the estimated TCP compared to the homogeneous dose by 0–51% for the learning set and by 4–30% for the test set. The potential for individual TCP gains with dose painting correlated with increasing Gleason score spread and larger prostate volumes. The TCP gains were also found to be larger for patients with a low expected TCP for the homogeneous dose prescription.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> We have from retrospective treatment data demonstrated a formalism that yield ADC driven dose painting prescriptions for prostate volumes that potentially can yield significant TCP increases without increasing dose burdens as compared to a homogeneous treatment dose. This motivates further development of the approach to consider more accurate ADC to Gleason mappings, issues with delivery robustness of heterogeneous dose distributions, and patient selection criteria for design of clinical trials.