Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

In re Google Gmail Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Publication date

January 2014

Publisher

Santa Clara Law Digital Commons

Language

English

Abstract

Notice of Motion and Motion of Non-Party Press Organizations for an Order to Intervene and Opposition to Parties\u27 Motion to Sea

Extracted data

Related items

State v. Rodriguez Respondent\u27s Brief Dckt. 46333

August 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8666/thumbnail.jp

Primera Beef, LLC v. Ward Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 46595

April 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8695/thumbnail.jp

State v. Davis Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 44476

March 2017

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/7518/thumbnail.jp

In re Google Gmail Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

January 2014

Notice of Motion and Motion of Non-Party Press Organizations for an Order to Intervene and Oppositio...

Warner Bros v Charter Communications

District of Colorado

January 2019

DEFENDANT CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDATION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO DENY CHA...

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, civil action no: 17-cv-00099 Hon. John P. Bailey. The Marshall County Coal Company, the Marion County Coal Company, the Harrison County Coal Company, the Ohio County Coal Company, Murray Energy Corporation, and Robert E. Murray, plaintiffs v. John Oliver, Charles Wilson, Partially Important Productions, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc., Time Warner Inc., and Does 1 through 10, defendants.

West Virginia Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union of

January 2017

Brief amicus curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation in opposition ...

Doe v. Backpage.com

D. Massachusetts

January 2015

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6

E-ventures v. Google

Middle District of Florida

January 2016

E-VENTURES’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN

Pizzuto v. State Appellant\u27s Reply Brief Dckt. 47709

July 2020

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/9162/thumbnail.jp

Insurer LMI\u27s Omnibus Reply in Support of Claim Objections

January 2022

Insurer LMI\u27s Omnibus Reply in Support of Claim Objections, filed January 18, 2022

Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Initiative files amicus brief in support of Apache Stronghold in Oak Flat litigation

Notre Dame Law School

February 2021

The Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Initiative has filed an amicus brief in the United State...

Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Law of Non-Profit Organizations in Support of Respondent: Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Matthew Rodriguez, Nos. 19-251 & 19-255

Hackney, Philip
Aprill, Ellen P
Colinvaux, Roger
Delaney, Sean
Fishman, James
Galle, Brian
Horwitz, Jill R
Lott, Cindy M
Madoff, Ray
Manny, Jill
McLaughlin, Nancy
Schmalbeck, Richard

March 2021

This was a brief filed with the Supreme Court of the United States supporting the state of Californi...

State v. Kent Appellant\u27s Reply Brief Dckt. 47163

March 2020

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8946/thumbnail.jp

Fields v. Twitter

Northern District of California

January 2016

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAIN

Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Company Respondent\u27s Brief 1 Dckt. 45580

July 2018

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8276/thumbnail.jp

State v. Rodriguez Respondent\u27s Brief Dckt. 46333

August 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8666/thumbnail.jp

Primera Beef, LLC v. Ward Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 46595

April 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8695/thumbnail.jp

State v. Davis Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 44476

March 2017

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/7518/thumbnail.jp

In re Google Gmail Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

January 2014

Notice of Motion and Motion of Non-Party Press Organizations for an Order to Intervene and Oppositio...

Warner Bros v Charter Communications

District of Colorado

January 2019

DEFENDANT CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDATION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO DENY CHA...

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, civil action no: 17-cv-00099 Hon. John P. Bailey. The Marshall County Coal Company, the Marion County Coal Company, the Harrison County Coal Company, the Ohio County Coal Company, Murray Energy Corporation, and Robert E. Murray, plaintiffs v. John Oliver, Charles Wilson, Partially Important Productions, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc., Time Warner Inc., and Does 1 through 10, defendants.

West Virginia Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union of

January 2017

Brief amicus curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation in opposition ...

Doe v. Backpage.com

D. Massachusetts

January 2015

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6

E-ventures v. Google

Middle District of Florida

January 2016

E-VENTURES’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMEN

Pizzuto v. State Appellant\u27s Reply Brief Dckt. 47709

July 2020

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/9162/thumbnail.jp

Insurer LMI\u27s Omnibus Reply in Support of Claim Objections

January 2022

Insurer LMI\u27s Omnibus Reply in Support of Claim Objections, filed January 18, 2022

Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Initiative files amicus brief in support of Apache Stronghold in Oak Flat litigation

Notre Dame Law School

February 2021

The Notre Dame Law School Religious Liberty Initiative has filed an amicus brief in the United State...

Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Law of Non-Profit Organizations in Support of Respondent: Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Matthew Rodriguez, Nos. 19-251 & 19-255

Hackney, Philip
Aprill, Ellen P
Colinvaux, Roger
Delaney, Sean
Fishman, James
Galle, Brian
Horwitz, Jill R
Lott, Cindy M
Madoff, Ray
Manny, Jill
McLaughlin, Nancy
Schmalbeck, Richard

March 2021

This was a brief filed with the Supreme Court of the United States supporting the state of Californi...

State v. Kent Appellant\u27s Reply Brief Dckt. 47163

March 2020

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8946/thumbnail.jp

Fields v. Twitter

Northern District of California

January 2016

PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAIN

Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Company Respondent\u27s Brief 1 Dckt. 45580

July 2018

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8276/thumbnail.jp

State v. Rodriguez Respondent\u27s Brief Dckt. 46333

August 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8666/thumbnail.jp

Primera Beef, LLC v. Ward Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 46595

April 2019

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/8695/thumbnail.jp

State v. Davis Appellant\u27s Brief Dckt. 44476

March 2017

https://digitalcommons.law.uidaho.edu/idaho_supreme_court_record_briefs/7518/thumbnail.jp