In this paper we consider the effects of negative and positive risk information on perceived seafood risks and seafood consumption by gender and race. The data is from a Mid-Atlantic survey of coastal seafood consumers. We elicit risk perceptions in three risk scenarios with a dichotomous choice with a follow-up question format. We elicit continuous revealed and stated preference seafood consumption in nine risk and price scenarios. Analysis in four gender and race categories indicates that demographic groups respond to the positive and negative information in different ways. Communication of risk information as risk mitigation policy is a challenge
This paper presents the results of a study that tests the hypothesis that the effect of risk prefere...
This study analyzes the impacts of consumer differentiated Mississippi/Alabama Gulf Coast region (GC...
Consumer beliefs about the safety and sustainability of aquaculture are statistically related concep...
This paper identifies factors that influence consumers' seafood safety perceptions and examines how ...
PresentationFor US aquaculture industry, primary factors influencing their competitiveness are consu...
We use contingent behavior analysis to study the effects of pfiesteria-related fish kills on the dem...
A variety of factors combine to limit seafood consumption. Seafood is perceived to be expensive, and...
Suggested Bibliographic Reference: NAAFE Forum 2017 Proceedings, March 22-24, 2017. Compiled by Ann ...
The aquaculture industry has expanded to fill the gap between plateauing wild seafood supply and gro...
Research to define and convey seafood risks and benefits, such as cultural significance and nutritio...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Most consumers have positive attitudes toward seafood and consider it to be an important part of a h...
We attempt to value health risks by combining traditional demand impact analysis with direct elicita...
This paper presents the results of a study that tests the hypothesis that the effect of risk prefere...
This study analyzes the impacts of consumer differentiated Mississippi/Alabama Gulf Coast region (GC...
Consumer beliefs about the safety and sustainability of aquaculture are statistically related concep...
This paper identifies factors that influence consumers' seafood safety perceptions and examines how ...
PresentationFor US aquaculture industry, primary factors influencing their competitiveness are consu...
We use contingent behavior analysis to study the effects of pfiesteria-related fish kills on the dem...
A variety of factors combine to limit seafood consumption. Seafood is perceived to be expensive, and...
Suggested Bibliographic Reference: NAAFE Forum 2017 Proceedings, March 22-24, 2017. Compiled by Ann ...
The aquaculture industry has expanded to fill the gap between plateauing wild seafood supply and gro...
Research to define and convey seafood risks and benefits, such as cultural significance and nutritio...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Communicating about the health effects of fish and seafood may potentially result in a conflict situ...
Most consumers have positive attitudes toward seafood and consider it to be an important part of a h...
We attempt to value health risks by combining traditional demand impact analysis with direct elicita...
This paper presents the results of a study that tests the hypothesis that the effect of risk prefere...
This study analyzes the impacts of consumer differentiated Mississippi/Alabama Gulf Coast region (GC...
Consumer beliefs about the safety and sustainability of aquaculture are statistically related concep...