The 'Not-In-My-Backyard' (NIMBY) syndrome is analyzed in economic decision making. Belief statements that reflect specific NIMBY concerns are subjected to factor analysis and the structure reveals two dimensions: tolerance and avoidance. Tolerance reflects an acceptance of rational economic arguments regarding the siting of a hazardous waste facility and avoidance reflects a more personal fear-of-consequences. Analysis identifies demographic characteristics of individuals likely to exhibit these two beliefs. These beliefs also are shown to influence the acceptance of a hazardous waste disposal facility in ones neighborhood when compensation is offered
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 1984.MIC...
How do communities respond to the proposed placement of controversial facilities in their backyards?...
The ‘NIMBY’ (Not In My Back Yard) concept is commonly useing to explain public opposition to new dev...
Most discussions about public resistance to hazardous waste facility siting assume that opponents to...
Distrust of social institutions is becoming an important component of risk communication and policy ...
The siting of municipal solid waste disposal facilities is often unsuccessful or delayed because of ...
LULU (Locally Unwanted Land Use) and NIMBY (Never In My Back Yard) are often cited as two major hurd...
Proponents of hazardous and nuclear waste depositories label opponents to local siting of such facil...
経済学 / EconomicsNIMBY (not in my backyard) is the word used to describe the human behavior whereby a ...
Nuclear waste repository constitutes a great predicament in many countries. In Sweden, the Not- In-M...
In environmental planning, decision making on land use for infrastructure increasingly causes confli...
This paper describes methods for evaluating perception-based economic impacts resulting from siting ...
The siting of hazardous and nuclear waste facilities has proven to be a task of enormous difficulty ...
This chapter is about locally-unwanted land uses, specifically hazardous waste treatment facilities....
Given that perceived risk is multidimensional, the authors seek better understanding by focusing on ...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 1984.MIC...
How do communities respond to the proposed placement of controversial facilities in their backyards?...
The ‘NIMBY’ (Not In My Back Yard) concept is commonly useing to explain public opposition to new dev...
Most discussions about public resistance to hazardous waste facility siting assume that opponents to...
Distrust of social institutions is becoming an important component of risk communication and policy ...
The siting of municipal solid waste disposal facilities is often unsuccessful or delayed because of ...
LULU (Locally Unwanted Land Use) and NIMBY (Never In My Back Yard) are often cited as two major hurd...
Proponents of hazardous and nuclear waste depositories label opponents to local siting of such facil...
経済学 / EconomicsNIMBY (not in my backyard) is the word used to describe the human behavior whereby a ...
Nuclear waste repository constitutes a great predicament in many countries. In Sweden, the Not- In-M...
In environmental planning, decision making on land use for infrastructure increasingly causes confli...
This paper describes methods for evaluating perception-based economic impacts resulting from siting ...
The siting of hazardous and nuclear waste facilities has proven to be a task of enormous difficulty ...
This chapter is about locally-unwanted land uses, specifically hazardous waste treatment facilities....
Given that perceived risk is multidimensional, the authors seek better understanding by focusing on ...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 1984.MIC...
How do communities respond to the proposed placement of controversial facilities in their backyards?...
The ‘NIMBY’ (Not In My Back Yard) concept is commonly useing to explain public opposition to new dev...