The Race Equality Directive : ‘differentiated’ or ‘differential’ Europeanisation in the new EU member states?

This article examines the Race Equality Directive (RED) and its transposition in the context of a new European Union (EU) member state, Baltic Lithuania. Taking this post-communist society as a case study, it is suggested that while formal legislative compliance with the RED has been broadly attained, transposed anti-discrimination legislation and national policy implementation initiatives may not adequately take into account societal attitudes and norms. The historical legacy of Soviet times, the contemporary post-communist experience, and the current economic crisis have resulted in a fragile national identity and a propensity towards populist and even xenophobic responses to uncertainty. These factors are explored in terms of their potential for undermining the objectives of EU-derived legislation designed to promote racial and ethnic tolerance. The article concludes that while a ‘differentiated’ Europeanisation has not occurred in formal terms, the possibility exists of ‘differential’ Europeanisation emerging in post-communist new EU member states such as Lithuania.Original Publication:Charles Woolfson, The Race Equality Directive: ‘differentiated’ or ‘differential’ Europeanisation in the new EU member states?, 2010, European Societies, (12), 4, 1-24.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2010.483005Copyright: Routledgehttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/default.as