Act amending the civil procedure act - service of documents

V magistrski nalogi sem primerjal institut vročanja pred uveljavitvijo novele ZPP-E in po tem. Med pisanjem diplomskega dela sem ugotovil, da je zakonodajalec področje vročanja posodobil in uskladil s pravno ureditvijo in sodno prakso. Postopek je s tem postal hitrejši, zanesljivejši in bolj ekonomičen. Pri spremembah se je zakonodajalec zgledoval po tuji pravni ureditvi in sodni praksi višjih sodišč ter postopek prilagodil nedavnim odločitvam ustavnega sodišča. Na področju elektronskega vročanja se je zgledoval predvsem po drugih postopkih s področja kazenskega, upravnega in zemljiškoknjižnega prava, ki vročanje po elektronski poti že urejujejo. Pisanja se vročajo po pošti, po varni elektronski poti, po delavcu sodišča, na sodišču, na predlog stranke po detektivu ali izvršitelju in v poštni predal. Sodišče vroči pisanje po elektronski poti, če oseba sporoči, da želi vročanje po tej poti, ali če stranka uporabi elektronsko pot za vložitev svoje vloge. Sodišče pa lahko samo, brez želje naslovnika, določi vročitev po elektronski poti, če izpolni v zakonu določene pogoje. Sodišče ima možnost, da lahko ustno povabi na naslednji narok in posebno vročanje vabil ni potrebno. Prav tako lahko sodišče odredi neposredno vročanje med odvetniki kot obvezno. Poenotena so pravila vročanja za pravne osebe, tudi za odvetnike, notarje in samoupravne lokalne skupnosti. Vročanje odvetnikom se tako izenači z vročanjem pravnim osebam in drugim profesionalnim subjektom. Zakon ni razlikoval med osebno in navadno vročitvijo po varni elektronski poti. Za vsa pisanja, ki so se vročala po varni elektronsko poti, so veljala enaka pravila. S spremembo je zakonodajalec uredil tudi možnost navadnega vročanja po varni elektronski poti. Fizični osebi z neznanim naslovom se vroča tako, da vročevalec pisanja avtomatsko prepošlje na nov naslov, če ga izve. Če to ni mogoče, sodišče poišče naslov v registru ali pozove nasprotno stranko, da sporoči nov naslov, hkrati pa sproži postopek ugotavljanja dejanskega prebivališča ali poizvedbo pri osebah, ki bi lahko vedele za nov naslov.In the master\u27s thesis, I compared the institute of Service of Process before and after the introduction of the amendments to the Civil Procedure Act. If I briefly summarize the key findings I have learned during the writing of the diploma paper, I can assert that the legislature has modernized and coordinated the field of serving documents with legal regulation and case law. This process of serving documents has become faster, more reliable and more economical. In the course of the changes, the legislator was inspired by the foreign legal system, the jurisprudence of the higher courts, and adapted the procedure to the recent decisions of the Constitutional Court. In the field of electronic mail delivery service, he followed primarily other procedures in the field of criminal, administrative and land registry law, which are already regulated by electronic means. Documents are served by post, by secure electronic route, by court official, at court, at the request of the client by the detective or the executor and in the mailbox. The court serves documents by electronic means, if the person informs the court that he wishes the service on that way, or if the client uses an electronic route for filing his application. However, the court may, without the consent of the addressee, determine the service by electronic means if it fulfils certain conditions in the law. The court has the option to invite the client verbally to the next hearing, so that special service of invitations is not required. The court may also order direct service between lawyers, as mandatory. Unified are the rules of service for legal persons, including lawyers, notaries and self-governing local communities. Serving mail to lawyers is also equalized to the service of legal persons and other professional subjects. The law did not distinguish between personal and ordinary service of a secure electronic way. The same rules were applied to the all documents that were served on a secure electronic way. With the change, the legislature regulated the possibility of ordinary service of documents over an electronic way. A natural person with an unknown address is mail served to a new address automatically by the correspondent, if he knows address. If this is not possible, the court seeks an address in the registry or invites a counterparty to report a new address, and at the same time initiates the process of determining the actual residence or query with persons who might be aware of the new address