We use recently developed approaches in argumentation theory in order to revamp the hypothetico-deductive model of confirmation, thus alleviating the well-known paradoxes the H-D account faces. More specifically, we introduce the concept of dialectic confirmation on the background of the so-called theory of dialectical structures (Betz 2010, 2011). Dialectic confirmation generalises hypothetico-deductive confirmation and mitigates the raven paradox, the grue paradox, the tacking paradox, the paradox from conceptual difference, and the problem of novelty
Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and characterizing the ...
Any precise version of H-D needs to handle various problems, most notably, the problem of selective ...
Abstract. The general purpose of this paper is to demonstrate through a well defined example how phi...
We use recently developed approaches in argumentation theory in order to revamp the hypothetico-dedu...
This paper synthesizes confirmation by instances and confirmation by successful predictions, and the...
ABSTRACT. Hypothetico-deductivists have struggled to develop qualitative confirmation theories not r...
Patrick Maher’s (PM, for short) critical paper requires a long reply. His first main point is my non...
Well-known paradoxes of confirmation put the validity of inductive reasoning of any kind into questi...
Alleged counter-examples deployed in Park (2004) against the account of selective hypothetico deduct...
This paper is devoted to analysis of co-called paradox of confirmation formulated by C. G. Hempel in...
attempt to unify inductivist and hypothetico-deductivist intuitions on confirmation by means of a si...
This dissertation concerns the interpretation and structure of two intuitive notions: rational crede...
Hempel first introduced the paradox of confirmation in 1937. Since then, a very extensive literature...
The aim of this thesis essay is to show that Bayesian confirmation theory can be used instead of the...
The problem of induction reminds us that science cannot wait for empirical hypotheses to be verified...
Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and characterizing the ...
Any precise version of H-D needs to handle various problems, most notably, the problem of selective ...
Abstract. The general purpose of this paper is to demonstrate through a well defined example how phi...
We use recently developed approaches in argumentation theory in order to revamp the hypothetico-dedu...
This paper synthesizes confirmation by instances and confirmation by successful predictions, and the...
ABSTRACT. Hypothetico-deductivists have struggled to develop qualitative confirmation theories not r...
Patrick Maher’s (PM, for short) critical paper requires a long reply. His first main point is my non...
Well-known paradoxes of confirmation put the validity of inductive reasoning of any kind into questi...
Alleged counter-examples deployed in Park (2004) against the account of selective hypothetico deduct...
This paper is devoted to analysis of co-called paradox of confirmation formulated by C. G. Hempel in...
attempt to unify inductivist and hypothetico-deductivist intuitions on confirmation by means of a si...
This dissertation concerns the interpretation and structure of two intuitive notions: rational crede...
Hempel first introduced the paradox of confirmation in 1937. Since then, a very extensive literature...
The aim of this thesis essay is to show that Bayesian confirmation theory can be used instead of the...
The problem of induction reminds us that science cannot wait for empirical hypotheses to be verified...
Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and characterizing the ...
Any precise version of H-D needs to handle various problems, most notably, the problem of selective ...
Abstract. The general purpose of this paper is to demonstrate through a well defined example how phi...