Add to ORKGIn a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction strategies as a new approach to Hume's. This comment examines the limitations of Schurz's approach. It can be proven that the meta-inductivist approach does not work any more if the meta-inductivists have to face an infinite number of alternative predictors. With his limitation it remains doubtful whether the meta-inductivist can provide a full solution to the problem of induction
ABSTRACT. We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive un...
I start this paper with three conceptual clarifications: (1.) What do I mean with the problem of ind...
This paper concerns the following interpretative problem: Hume\u27s most explicit arguments in both ...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
In this paper I present a game-theoretical approach to the problem of induction. I investigate the c...
This paper poses a challenge to Schurz's proposed meta-inductive justification of induction. It is a...
I evaluate Schurz's proposed meta-inductive justification of induction, a refinement of Reichenbach'...
Douven (in press) observes that Schurz's meta-inductive justification of induction cannot explain th...
The no free lunch theorem (Wolpert 1996) is a radicalized version of Hume's induction skepticism. It...
This paper aims to advance two claims. First, it aims to show that Hume's argument against the ratio...
My first goal is to motivate a distinctively metaphysical approach to the problem of induction. I ar...
This paper explains what’s wrong with a Hume-inspired argument for skepticism about induction. Hume’...
Confronted with the problem of induction, Hans Reichenbach accepts that we cannot justify that induc...
International audienceThis paper supports the contention that the general rules introduced by Hume i...
ABSTRACT. We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive un...
I start this paper with three conceptual clarifications: (1.) What do I mean with the problem of ind...
This paper concerns the following interpretative problem: Hume\u27s most explicit arguments in both ...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
In this paper I present a game-theoretical approach to the problem of induction. I investigate the c...
This paper poses a challenge to Schurz's proposed meta-inductive justification of induction. It is a...
I evaluate Schurz's proposed meta-inductive justification of induction, a refinement of Reichenbach'...
Douven (in press) observes that Schurz's meta-inductive justification of induction cannot explain th...
The no free lunch theorem (Wolpert 1996) is a radicalized version of Hume's induction skepticism. It...
This paper aims to advance two claims. First, it aims to show that Hume's argument against the ratio...
My first goal is to motivate a distinctively metaphysical approach to the problem of induction. I ar...
This paper explains what’s wrong with a Hume-inspired argument for skepticism about induction. Hume’...
Confronted with the problem of induction, Hans Reichenbach accepts that we cannot justify that induc...
International audienceThis paper supports the contention that the general rules introduced by Hume i...
ABSTRACT. We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive un...
I start this paper with three conceptual clarifications: (1.) What do I mean with the problem of ind...
This paper concerns the following interpretative problem: Hume\u27s most explicit arguments in both ...