Add to ORKGJulian Barbour's approach to dynamics is reviewed. With a particular focus on questions of explanation and confirmation, the approach is contrasted with standard formulations of dynamics. This paper expands upon my commentary on Lawrence Sklar's paper at the Philosophy of Time Society meeting at the APA's Central Division meeting in Chicago, April 2004. Although a commentary, the current paper is comprehensible without reference to Sklar's paper
This book defends a relational theory of the passage of time. The realist view of passage developed ...
Substantivalists believe that spacetime and its parts are fundamental constituents of reality. Rela...
Relationalism – along the lines developed by Barbour and collaborators in the past 3 decades – can b...
Julian Barbour's approach to dynamics is reviewed. With a particular focus on questions of explanati...
This paper defends a relational view of time based on recent work on quantum gravity. Julian barbour...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
In a companion paper (Pooley & Brown 2001) it is argued that Julian Barbour's Machian approach t...
I discuss J. Barbour's Machian theories of dynamics, and his proposal that a Machian perspective ena...
There are two fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of space and time. On the one side, ...
There are two fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of space and time. On the one side, ...
This dissertation is a defense of an Aristotelian, relational view of time. The Aristotelian holds t...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44466/1/10701_2004_Article_379223.pd
I argue that Hume’s philosophy of time is relationist in the following two senses. 1) Standard defin...
This book defends a relational theory of the passage of time. The realist view of passage developed ...
Substantivalists believe that spacetime and its parts are fundamental constituents of reality. Rela...
Relationalism – along the lines developed by Barbour and collaborators in the past 3 decades – can b...
Julian Barbour's approach to dynamics is reviewed. With a particular focus on questions of explanati...
This paper defends a relational view of time based on recent work on quantum gravity. Julian barbour...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
Sklar ([1974]) claimed that relationalism about ontology—the doctrine that space and time do not exi...
In a companion paper (Pooley & Brown 2001) it is argued that Julian Barbour's Machian approach t...
I discuss J. Barbour's Machian theories of dynamics, and his proposal that a Machian perspective ena...
There are two fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of space and time. On the one side, ...
There are two fundamentally different conceptions of the nature of space and time. On the one side, ...
This dissertation is a defense of an Aristotelian, relational view of time. The Aristotelian holds t...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44466/1/10701_2004_Article_379223.pd
I argue that Hume’s philosophy of time is relationist in the following two senses. 1) Standard defin...
This book defends a relational theory of the passage of time. The realist view of passage developed ...
Substantivalists believe that spacetime and its parts are fundamental constituents of reality. Rela...
Relationalism – along the lines developed by Barbour and collaborators in the past 3 decades – can b...