Recent discussions in the philosophy of biology have brought into question some fundamental assumptions regarding evolutionary processes, natural selection in particular. Some authors argue that natural selection is nothing but a population-level, statistical consequence of lower-level events (Matthen and Ariew [2002]; Walsh, Lewens, and Ariew [2002]). On this view, natural selection itself does not involve forces. Other authors reject this purely statistical, population-level account for an individual-level, causal account of natural selection (Bouchard and Rosenberg [2004]). I argue that each of these positions is right in one way, but wrong in another; natural selection indeed takes place at the level of populations, but it is a causal p...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a considerable amount of debate concerning what theoretic...
This paper is about mechanisms and models, and how they interact. In part, it is a response to recen...
We distinguish dynamical and statistical interpretations of evolutionary theory. We argue that only ...
Recent discussions in the philosophy of biology have brought into question some fundamental assumpti...
Vol. 3, Springer. In the recent philosophical literature, two questions have arisen concerning the s...
In the recent philosophical literature, two questions have arisen concerning the status of natural s...
Recent papers by a number of philosophers have been concerned with the question of whether natural s...
Some philosophers, known as statisticalists, claim that the concept of natural selection, as it is n...
Recent discussions in the philosophy of biology have brought into question some fundamental assumpti...
I argue here that the debate over the causal status of natural selection, genetic drift, and fitness...
This paper argues for two claims. First, despite a persistent appearance to the contrary in the phi...
To what do "natural selection" and "genetic drift" refer? To causes, as is usually thought? Or to me...
Evolutionary processes such as natural selection and random drift are commonly regarded as causes of...
To what do "natural selection" and "genetic drift" refer? To causes, as is usually thought? Or to me...
A recent debate over the causal foundations of evolutionary theory pits those who believe that natur...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a considerable amount of debate concerning what theoretic...
This paper is about mechanisms and models, and how they interact. In part, it is a response to recen...
We distinguish dynamical and statistical interpretations of evolutionary theory. We argue that only ...
Recent discussions in the philosophy of biology have brought into question some fundamental assumpti...
Vol. 3, Springer. In the recent philosophical literature, two questions have arisen concerning the s...
In the recent philosophical literature, two questions have arisen concerning the status of natural s...
Recent papers by a number of philosophers have been concerned with the question of whether natural s...
Some philosophers, known as statisticalists, claim that the concept of natural selection, as it is n...
Recent discussions in the philosophy of biology have brought into question some fundamental assumpti...
I argue here that the debate over the causal status of natural selection, genetic drift, and fitness...
This paper argues for two claims. First, despite a persistent appearance to the contrary in the phi...
To what do "natural selection" and "genetic drift" refer? To causes, as is usually thought? Or to me...
Evolutionary processes such as natural selection and random drift are commonly regarded as causes of...
To what do "natural selection" and "genetic drift" refer? To causes, as is usually thought? Or to me...
A recent debate over the causal foundations of evolutionary theory pits those who believe that natur...
Over the past fifteen years there has been a considerable amount of debate concerning what theoretic...
This paper is about mechanisms and models, and how they interact. In part, it is a response to recen...
We distinguish dynamical and statistical interpretations of evolutionary theory. We argue that only ...