Social impact retrieval: measuring author influence on information retrieval

The increased presence of technologies collectively referred to as Web 2.0 mean the entire process of new media production and dissemination has moved away from an \ud authorcentric approach. Casual web users and browsers are increasingly able to play a more active role in the information creation process. This means that the traditional ways in which information sources may be validated and scored must adapt accordingly. \ud In this thesis we propose a new way in which to look at a user's contributions to the network in which they are present, using these interactions to provide a measure of \ud authority and centrality to the user. This measure is then used to attribute an query-independent interest score to each of the contributions the author makes, enabling us \ud to provide other users with relevant information which has been of greatest interest to a community of like-minded users. This is done through the development of two \ud algorithms; AuthorRank and MessageRank. \ud We present two real-world user experiments which focussed around multimedia annotation and browsing systems that we built; these systems were novel in themselves, bringing together video and text browsing, as well as free-text annotation. Using these systems as examples of real-world applications for our approaches, we then look at a \ud larger-scale experiment based on the author and citation networks of a ten year period of the ACM SIGIR conference on information retrieval between 1997-2007. We use the \ud citation context of SIGIR publications as a proxy for annotations, constructing large social networks between authors. Against these networks we show the effectiveness of \ud incorporating user generated content, or annotations, to improve information retrieval