The present paper presents a typological investigation of whether languages make an animacy distinction in their independent nominal interrogative pronouns. The data comprises 24 languages and was taken mainly from grammatical descriptions. 3rd person pronouns and relative pronouns are included for comparison. The outcome of the survey is that the vast majority of the sample languages do make a ‘who’ vs. ‘what’ distinction. Constructions special to questions, in particular fronting and its possible implications for the question words, are discussed, as is the role of case marking on interrogative pronouns.Animacy in Typolog
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
National audienceIn this talk I present a typology of non-selective interrogative pronominals, that ...
The present paper presents a typological investigation of whether languages make an animacy distinct...
The present paper presents a typological investigation of whether languages make an animacy distinct...
This research compares and analyzes similarities and differences in semantic aspects and their synta...
It is enlightened that the most common prompt for creating questions in language is the interrogativ...
This paper discusses a variety of questions regarding the form and function of relative pronouns in ...
It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inani...
We examine the varying role of conditions on grammatical relations marking (namely animacy and volit...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
National audienceIn this talk I present a typology of non-selective interrogative pronominals, that ...
The present paper presents a typological investigation of whether languages make an animacy distinct...
The present paper presents a typological investigation of whether languages make an animacy distinct...
This research compares and analyzes similarities and differences in semantic aspects and their synta...
It is enlightened that the most common prompt for creating questions in language is the interrogativ...
This paper discusses a variety of questions regarding the form and function of relative pronouns in ...
It has been argued that animate entities are referred to with more attenuated expressions than inani...
We examine the varying role of conditions on grammatical relations marking (namely animacy and volit...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choic...
National audienceIn this talk I present a typology of non-selective interrogative pronominals, that ...