Appendix at [LINK]http://hdl.handle.net/1805/14462[/LINK]With the exception of official court records, the papers generated by the Supreme Court justices in their work for the Court are and have always been considered private property. As a result, the justices’ treatment of these documents is idiosyncratic, ranging from outright destruction to lengthy restrictions to quick release. Adding the perspective of archivists and librarians, this paper explores the history of the justices’ papers and questions of access, the public’s interest in understanding the Court and its decisions, and the effect of the justices’ papers on scholarship and popular research. Several options for encouraging greater openness are proposed
Recent Supreme Court activity regarding intellectual property may lead some to believe the increas...
In this essay—considering privacy and secrecy in courts—I first offer a brief history of the pub...
Court records present a conundrum for privacy advocates. Public access to the courts has long been a...
This article explores the history of Supreme Court Justices’ papers and their status as private prop...
This article explores the history of Supreme Court Justices’ papers and their status as private prop...
Susan deMaine\u27s contribution to this volume is Should Supreme Court Justices Fear Access to Thei...
Appendix to Susan David, deMaine, Access to the Justices' Papers: A Better Balance, 110 Law Library ...
Who should own a federal judge’s papers? This question has rarely been asked. Instead, it has genera...
This essay examines the benefits and drawbacks of writing about the U.S. Supreme Court using the pap...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
This special issue of Court Review presents a topic that is central to our republic: access to justi...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
The United States Supreme Court has an uneasy relationship with openness: it complies with some cal...
The Supreme Court has an uneasy relationship with openness: it complies with some calls for transpar...
During a recent telephone conversation, a colleague and I discussed whether the United States Suprem...
Recent Supreme Court activity regarding intellectual property may lead some to believe the increas...
In this essay—considering privacy and secrecy in courts—I first offer a brief history of the pub...
Court records present a conundrum for privacy advocates. Public access to the courts has long been a...
This article explores the history of Supreme Court Justices’ papers and their status as private prop...
This article explores the history of Supreme Court Justices’ papers and their status as private prop...
Susan deMaine\u27s contribution to this volume is Should Supreme Court Justices Fear Access to Thei...
Appendix to Susan David, deMaine, Access to the Justices' Papers: A Better Balance, 110 Law Library ...
Who should own a federal judge’s papers? This question has rarely been asked. Instead, it has genera...
This essay examines the benefits and drawbacks of writing about the U.S. Supreme Court using the pap...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
This special issue of Court Review presents a topic that is central to our republic: access to justi...
When discussing the issue of transparency at the United States Supreme Court, most commentators focu...
The United States Supreme Court has an uneasy relationship with openness: it complies with some cal...
The Supreme Court has an uneasy relationship with openness: it complies with some calls for transpar...
During a recent telephone conversation, a colleague and I discussed whether the United States Suprem...
Recent Supreme Court activity regarding intellectual property may lead some to believe the increas...
In this essay—considering privacy and secrecy in courts—I first offer a brief history of the pub...
Court records present a conundrum for privacy advocates. Public access to the courts has long been a...