Liability versus Innovation: Unpacking Key Connections is a new international, cross-disciplinary network involving legal and medico-ethical researchers. Their ground-breaking seminars are where theory meets empirical experience, pointing the way to new approaches and policy directions. \ud \ud Medical innovation is crucial if new treatments and cures are to be found, but fear of legal action remains. An interdisciplinary project and seminar series, led by Tsachi Keren-Paz, Alicia El Haj and Tina Cockburn, provides key new insights
The notion of open innovation (OI) was introduced in 2003 by Henry Chesbrough who claims that since ...
Intellectual property is increasingly a misnomer since the right to exclude is the defining characte...
Abstract: In a seminal piece penned over four decades ago, Calabresi and Melamed theorised a legal r...
This special issue features papers culminating from a six seminar ESRC series ‘Liability versus inno...
With an ever-increasing number of liability lawsuits, are corporations electing to play it safe rath...
When economists speak of an underlying legal structure that imposes an absolute permission require...
The global intellectual property law system rests largely on a distinction between exclusive propert...
Product liability ideally should promote efficient levels of product safety, but misdirected liabil...
International audienceThe author investigates changes in French liability law that have occurred sin...
This paper reviews Creation Without Restraint: Promoting Liberty and Rivalry in Innovation, the path...
This Essay exposes and analyzes a hitherto overlooked cost of tort law: its adverse effect on innova...
The legal literature concerning the interplay between innovation and law is split between two stream...
Current academic and policy debates focus on the impact of tort reforms on physicians’ behavior and ...
We suggest a model of innovation and diffusion of a new technology in which two firms, one innovativ...
Product liability ideally should promote efficient levels of product safety but misdirected liabilit...
The notion of open innovation (OI) was introduced in 2003 by Henry Chesbrough who claims that since ...
Intellectual property is increasingly a misnomer since the right to exclude is the defining characte...
Abstract: In a seminal piece penned over four decades ago, Calabresi and Melamed theorised a legal r...
This special issue features papers culminating from a six seminar ESRC series ‘Liability versus inno...
With an ever-increasing number of liability lawsuits, are corporations electing to play it safe rath...
When economists speak of an underlying legal structure that imposes an absolute permission require...
The global intellectual property law system rests largely on a distinction between exclusive propert...
Product liability ideally should promote efficient levels of product safety, but misdirected liabil...
International audienceThe author investigates changes in French liability law that have occurred sin...
This paper reviews Creation Without Restraint: Promoting Liberty and Rivalry in Innovation, the path...
This Essay exposes and analyzes a hitherto overlooked cost of tort law: its adverse effect on innova...
The legal literature concerning the interplay between innovation and law is split between two stream...
Current academic and policy debates focus on the impact of tort reforms on physicians’ behavior and ...
We suggest a model of innovation and diffusion of a new technology in which two firms, one innovativ...
Product liability ideally should promote efficient levels of product safety but misdirected liabilit...
The notion of open innovation (OI) was introduced in 2003 by Henry Chesbrough who claims that since ...
Intellectual property is increasingly a misnomer since the right to exclude is the defining characte...
Abstract: In a seminal piece penned over four decades ago, Calabresi and Melamed theorised a legal r...