A transformatory ethic of inclusion : rupturing 'disability' and 'inclusion' for integrality

Inclusion, within the context of intellectual disability, is a topical notion which underpins contemporary human service practices and policies within Western\ud Judeo-Christian societies. As a concept, inclusion is most often considered within socio-historical and socio-political contexts, whereby technical and legislative responses are sought. However, this thesis explores the research question, "How ethically defensible is the notion of inclusion in relation to people with intellectual disability?" In undertaking a conceptual-theoretical analysis to ethically signify inclusion, the\ud thesis contends that inclusion is a multifaceted, complex concept in a dualistic and dichotomous relationship with exclusion. It is argued that historical and contemporary conceptualisations of exclusion for people with intellectual\ud disability have been constructed from various philosophical and theological matrices imbued with particular values about personhood. Furthermore, it is proposed that the ethical significance of inclusion and exclusion in the context of intellectual disability lies, not in the concepts themselves, but is defined and perpetuated by expressions of a particular socio-symbolic order underpinned by patriarchy and kyriarchy, and subjected to two controlling ethics - an Ethic of Normalcy and an Ethic of Anomaly. Inclusion and exclusion are conceived as\ud phenomena relating to how membership is defined, legitimated, or repelled by concealed, occluding boundaries acting within a patriarchal socio-ethical fabric.\ud The thesis argues that Ethical Inclusion is only possible through the rupture of these boundaries by A Transformatory Ethic of Inclusion. This is a conceptual instrument of rupture which embraces the scholarship of feminist ethics and feminist theology. Such a rupture dismantles the dualistic notions of inclusion and exclusion. It also requires examining the ways traditional ethical frameworks\ud themselves have conceptually diminished and devalued the authenticity of people with intellectual disability in ethical discussions. A concept of integrality becomes\ud imaginable. Conceptual analysis is framed using a crafting metaphor of a patchwork quilt which is infused with narrative; and by which, such an ethical exploration is\ud undertaken, and impaired, traditional ethical theorising is confronted and transformed