Radiologists can use outcome data such as cancer size and stage to determine how well their own practice provides benefit to their patients and can use measures such as screening recall rates and positive predictive values to assess how well adverse consequences are being contained. New data on national benchmarks for screening and diagnostic mammography in the United States allow radiologists to evaluate their own performance with respect to their peers. This article discusses recommended outcome values in the United States and Europe, current Mammography Quality Standards Act audit requirements, and Institute of Medicine proposals for future requirements
To examine whether U.S. radiologists’ interpretive volume affects their screening mammography perfor...
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all the breast imaging readers who took the time t...
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The purpose of this study was to identify a correlation between the s...
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the range of performance outcomes of the radiologist in an audi...
The U.S. Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) mandates medical audits to track breast cancer out...
PURPOSE: To evaluate a range of performance parameters pertinent to the comprehensive auditing of di...
Purpose: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards ...
Objective: Mammography has been recognized as the gold standard for screening breast cancer. To achi...
Purpose To establish contemporary performance benchmarks for diagnostic digital mammography with use...
Purpose To establish performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography and assess perf...
BackgroundMotivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and ...
ObjectiveUsing a combination of performance measures, we updated previously proposed criteria for id...
Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the results of all audits performed in the past and to asses...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
Radiologists ’ interpretive performance of mammography has remained highly variable despite improvem...
To examine whether U.S. radiologists’ interpretive volume affects their screening mammography perfor...
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all the breast imaging readers who took the time t...
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The purpose of this study was to identify a correlation between the s...
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the range of performance outcomes of the radiologist in an audi...
The U.S. Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) mandates medical audits to track breast cancer out...
PURPOSE: To evaluate a range of performance parameters pertinent to the comprehensive auditing of di...
Purpose: The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in 1992 to set national standards ...
Objective: Mammography has been recognized as the gold standard for screening breast cancer. To achi...
Purpose To establish contemporary performance benchmarks for diagnostic digital mammography with use...
Purpose To establish performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography and assess perf...
BackgroundMotivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and ...
ObjectiveUsing a combination of performance measures, we updated previously proposed criteria for id...
Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the results of all audits performed in the past and to asses...
Motivated by the challenges in assessing physician-level cancer screening performance and the negati...
Radiologists ’ interpretive performance of mammography has remained highly variable despite improvem...
To examine whether U.S. radiologists’ interpretive volume affects their screening mammography perfor...
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all the breast imaging readers who took the time t...
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The purpose of this study was to identify a correlation between the s...