This paper reviewed empirical studies that assessed the relationship between explicit financial incentives and the provision of high-quality health care. Thirteen of 17 studies examined the effect of incentives on process-of-care quality measures. Five of the 6 studies of physician-level financial incentives and 7 of the 9 studies of provider group-level financial incentives found partial or positive associations with measures of quality. One of the 2 studies of incentives at the payment-system level found a positive effect on access to care. In all, 4 studies suggested unintended effects of incentives
Patient experience measures are central to many pay-for-performance (P4P) programs nationally, but t...
ObjectivesNarrative review of the impact of pay-for-performance (P4P) and public reporting (PR) on h...
Abstract Background Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system t...
T Allen, T Mason, W WhittakerManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manch...
The adoption of pay-for-performance mechanisms for quality improvement is growing rapidly. While the...
PURPOSE: The efficacy of rewarding physicians financially for preventive services is unproven. The o...
BACKGROUND: Health plans, self-insured employers, health plans, and provider organizations are curre...
Since the 2000 publication of the Institute of Medicine report, To Err is Human the issue of healt...
Economic theory predicts that changing financial rewards will change behaviour. This is valid in ter...
Historically, most health care payment systems havepaid providers on the basis of the quantity or in...
Pay-for-performance approaches have been widely adopted in order to drive improvements in the qualit...
Background The quality and outcomes framework (QOF) is one of the world's largest pay-for-performanc...
The use of financial incentives to improve quality in health care has become widespread. Yet evidenc...
Australia introduced an incentive payment scheme for general practitioners to ensure systematic and ...
Stephen Gillam Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University ...
Patient experience measures are central to many pay-for-performance (P4P) programs nationally, but t...
ObjectivesNarrative review of the impact of pay-for-performance (P4P) and public reporting (PR) on h...
Abstract Background Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system t...
T Allen, T Mason, W WhittakerManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manch...
The adoption of pay-for-performance mechanisms for quality improvement is growing rapidly. While the...
PURPOSE: The efficacy of rewarding physicians financially for preventive services is unproven. The o...
BACKGROUND: Health plans, self-insured employers, health plans, and provider organizations are curre...
Since the 2000 publication of the Institute of Medicine report, To Err is Human the issue of healt...
Economic theory predicts that changing financial rewards will change behaviour. This is valid in ter...
Historically, most health care payment systems havepaid providers on the basis of the quantity or in...
Pay-for-performance approaches have been widely adopted in order to drive improvements in the qualit...
Background The quality and outcomes framework (QOF) is one of the world's largest pay-for-performanc...
The use of financial incentives to improve quality in health care has become widespread. Yet evidenc...
Australia introduced an incentive payment scheme for general practitioners to ensure systematic and ...
Stephen Gillam Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University ...
Patient experience measures are central to many pay-for-performance (P4P) programs nationally, but t...
ObjectivesNarrative review of the impact of pay-for-performance (P4P) and public reporting (PR) on h...
Abstract Background Pay-for-performance (P4P) is increasingly implemented in the healthcare system t...