Rules on organ donation are coherent

Rules about consent to organ donation are being reviewed in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. In law, organs and tissues cannot be taken after death if the deceased have not consented. Medical practice is also not to proceed if a family refuses consent, even against the wishes of the dead donor. These arrangements\u97the so called double veto\u97may be right or wrong but at least they are coherent, and that is encouraging, says one commentator. The ethical situation is complex: arguments for granting a veto to one side tend to undermine those for the granting it to the other. The double veto can be interpreted as coherent by adopting an argument that it has the best effects, or an alternative argument that the rights of the deceased and their families are negative rights\u97against interference\u97as opposed to positive rights\u97to obtaining help\u97and therefore limited to a veto. The best effects argument contends . .