In Angove's Pty Ltd v Bailey the Supreme Court faced ‘two important and controversial questions of commercial law’: whether an agent's authority could ever be ‘irrevocable’, and whether the receipt of money by an imminent insolvent could ever give rise to a constructive trust of that sum. It answered both in the affirmative, albeit subject to heavy qualifications. This note supports these conclusions in principle, however it will argue that the court's reasoning, especially in answering the second question, leaves much to be desired. In particular, it ignored the central role of fiduciary law in regulating the conduct of agents
This Article examines the dilemma of a fiduciary acting for parties who, as among themselves, have c...
Defendant, a real estate broker purporting to act for X, made a contract with plaintiff for the sale...
The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received ...
Fiduciary law necessarily raises issues of delineation and demarcation, which this paper demonstrate...
The extent to which agents, acting on behalf of trustees, may incur personal responsibility as const...
It is a striking proof of the fact that Agency is a modern subject in the law that Blackstone, in hi...
Lord Herschell once wrote that ‘it is an inflexible rule of a Court of Equity that a person in a fid...
Sorretirres a person may not be able to act for himself. He may suddenly fall ill and be unable to w...
In a highly interlacing commercial and industrial world, the need to employ others (agents) to carr...
§ I. PURPOSE of THIS PAPER.-It has been seen in another place how the relation of principal and agen...
The duties that principals and agents owe each other are typically coterminous with the agency relat...
The traditional default rule in the United States has been that, where two brokerage firms participa...
Taggart embezzled from his principal, defendant American National Insurance Company, $1,000 received...
The extent to which acquisitive breaches of fiduciary obligation trigger a constructive trust remain...
This chapter in a forthcoming book justifies the conventional characterization of common-law agency ...
This Article examines the dilemma of a fiduciary acting for parties who, as among themselves, have c...
Defendant, a real estate broker purporting to act for X, made a contract with plaintiff for the sale...
The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received ...
Fiduciary law necessarily raises issues of delineation and demarcation, which this paper demonstrate...
The extent to which agents, acting on behalf of trustees, may incur personal responsibility as const...
It is a striking proof of the fact that Agency is a modern subject in the law that Blackstone, in hi...
Lord Herschell once wrote that ‘it is an inflexible rule of a Court of Equity that a person in a fid...
Sorretirres a person may not be able to act for himself. He may suddenly fall ill and be unable to w...
In a highly interlacing commercial and industrial world, the need to employ others (agents) to carr...
§ I. PURPOSE of THIS PAPER.-It has been seen in another place how the relation of principal and agen...
The duties that principals and agents owe each other are typically coterminous with the agency relat...
The traditional default rule in the United States has been that, where two brokerage firms participa...
Taggart embezzled from his principal, defendant American National Insurance Company, $1,000 received...
The extent to which acquisitive breaches of fiduciary obligation trigger a constructive trust remain...
This chapter in a forthcoming book justifies the conventional characterization of common-law agency ...
This Article examines the dilemma of a fiduciary acting for parties who, as among themselves, have c...
Defendant, a real estate broker purporting to act for X, made a contract with plaintiff for the sale...
The question for the United Kingdom Supreme Court was whether a bribe or secret commission received ...