Add to ORKGIt is by now a weIl-known topic in semantics that there are striking similarities between the meanings of nominal and verbal expressions, insofar as the mass:count distinction in the nominal domain is reflected in the atelic:telic distinction in the verbal domain (cf. Leisi 1953, Taylor 1977, Bach 1986, to cite just a few authors). However, these supposed similarities have not be made explicit in formal representations
This paper makes two central claims. The first is that there is an intimate and non-trivial relation...
Semanticists often assume an ontology for natural language that includes not only ordinary objects, ...
There is an emerging view according to which countability is not an integral part of the lexical mea...
In this paper, we sketch a new approach to the problem of the temporal interpretation of nominal pre...
This paper discusses three approaches to the semantics of event nominalizations and adverbial modifi...
The thematic volume ‘Determiners and quantifiers: Functions, variation, and change’ explores the int...
this paper, we propose a unified treatment of these cases of temporal reference by appealing to a di...
In this paper, we deal with the semantic interaction between ung-nominalizations of different event ...
This thesis presents an empirical investigation into the nature and degree of nominality, from a sem...
Many linguists have pointed out a correspondence between the mass-count distinction in the nominal d...
A theory of nominalization should specify the relation between noun meaning and verb meaning. At lea...
Quantified expressions in natural language generally are taken to act like quantifiers in logic, whi...
Noun phrases with overt determiners, such as some apples or a quantity of milk, differ from bare nou...
The nature of -ing nominals has been widely debated since the early days of generative grammar (e.g....
This paper makes two central claims. The first is that there is an intimate and non-trivial relation...
Semanticists often assume an ontology for natural language that includes not only ordinary objects, ...
There is an emerging view according to which countability is not an integral part of the lexical mea...
In this paper, we sketch a new approach to the problem of the temporal interpretation of nominal pre...
This paper discusses three approaches to the semantics of event nominalizations and adverbial modifi...
The thematic volume ‘Determiners and quantifiers: Functions, variation, and change’ explores the int...
this paper, we propose a unified treatment of these cases of temporal reference by appealing to a di...
In this paper, we deal with the semantic interaction between ung-nominalizations of different event ...
This thesis presents an empirical investigation into the nature and degree of nominality, from a sem...
Many linguists have pointed out a correspondence between the mass-count distinction in the nominal d...
A theory of nominalization should specify the relation between noun meaning and verb meaning. At lea...
Quantified expressions in natural language generally are taken to act like quantifiers in logic, whi...
Noun phrases with overt determiners, such as some apples or a quantity of milk, differ from bare nou...
The nature of -ing nominals has been widely debated since the early days of generative grammar (e.g....
This paper makes two central claims. The first is that there is an intimate and non-trivial relation...
Semanticists often assume an ontology for natural language that includes not only ordinary objects, ...
There is an emerging view according to which countability is not an integral part of the lexical mea...