An exploration of how consistently and precisely mathematics teachers code-switch in multilingual classrooms

Many education research studies conducted in and outside South Africa encourage teachers to take advantage of the presence of multilingualism in their classrooms and to use it to the advancement of students’ conceptual learning. This study adopts the notion that code switching is a potential resource that teachers can use when teaching multilingual mathematics classes. The aim of this study is to determine how precisely and consistently selected teachers of multilingual mathematics classes code switched during teaching of trigonometry and geometry at secondary school. This study is informed by socio-cultural theory in general and Vygotsky’s work in particular. It focussed specifically on the critical role that language plays in the teaching and cognitive development of mathematics. My study situated within an interpretivist paradigm, used a case study research design and a mixed method research approach. Data were obtained through document collection, observing and interviewing three Grade 11 Mathematics teachers purposively selected from three secondary schools in Grahamstown and King Williamstown education districts of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Data were quantitatively and qualitatively analysed. Findings from this study revealed that the frequency of code switching was not consistent across teachers, topics and lessons. Teachers taught predominantly in the public domain exposing students to compromised mathematical content through their code switching practices. Borrowing code switching was prevalently employed consistently across the participating teachers. Very little transparent code switching, from mainly those mathematical terms commonly used in the foundation and the intermediate phases, was evident in teacher language. No Grade 11 trigonometry and geometry terms in isiXhosa were transparently and consistently code switched. The data suggested that while precision was observed in some cases, it was not consistent. Inconsistencies were caused by lack of planning for code switching, lack of teaching materials in indigenous languages, selective code switching, and ‘safe mode’ code switching strategies which affected teachers’ pedagogical practices. Overall results in this study illustrate that the lack of planning for code switching and the lack of explicit policies and clear-cut official positions on code switching for teaching has contributed to inconsistent and imprecise code switching by the participating teachers. This study concludes that the development of supporting mechanisms, identifying and documenting best practices to encourage transparent, meaningful and beneficial code switching is urgently required to aid and promote conceptual understanding of strongly bounded sub-registers of secondary school mathematics such as trigonometry and geometry. It is anticipated that this study will contribute significantly to the ongoing debate on language use in education and to the institution of best practices for judicious, consistent and precise use of students’ home language during the teaching of mathematics in South Africa