Figure 4 - Comparative display of five datasets containing Minyomerus records with an aligner. Each column shows the aligner or one of the datasets as both hierarchy and name usage assignment to higher name usage. Widths of the columns were adjusted to show full higher taxonomy. Hierarchies are expanded from root node to name usages selected in the name list pane of which nodes in the tree diagrams are highlighted. A row of the table indicates distribution of the name literal in the datasets, where each cell of the aligner column contains the name literal of interest, while each cell of datasets contains higher name usages of the name literal if the name literal is used in the dataset. Therefore, missing names result in a vacancy i...
Figure 2 - Taxonomic Name Resolution. Overview of the Name Resolution function of the Taxon...
Figure 4 - Results of 16S mtDNA analysis. A Consensus tree from Maximum Likelihood analysis. Scale b...
Figure 4 Example of a "catch-all" drawer with potentially dozens of different species. An effort was...
Figure 5 - Comparison of Minyomerus species in hierarchical trees. Hierarchical display of ...
The Species API of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) provides public access to tax...
Figure 4 - (A) Input visualization and (B) alignment visualization for the taxonomic concep...
Figure 4 - Fate of nodes as they move through the alignment procedure. Green, rounded boxes...
Figure 4 - BioSTIF web interface. The interface allows users to filter species occurrence p...
Figure 4 - Carl Linnaeus used candle-lit microscopes with primitive optics to examine his...
Figure 1 Create taxon name process. This process is called by the main process (Fig. 2) if the full ...
Figure 1 - Arrangement of input visualizations 1–9 (1831–1920) representing relevant prior Taxonomie...
Figure 1 - Simplified schema of Avibase primary tables, The Avibase ID table is the central element ...
Figure 3 Example of one text snippet resulting from running Biodiversity Observations Miner with O'F...
Figure 4b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from five articles published in Biodiversity Data ...
Figure 4 - OpenUp! Data Quality Toolkit annotation indicating that an identification is using a name...
Figure 2 - Taxonomic Name Resolution. Overview of the Name Resolution function of the Taxon...
Figure 4 - Results of 16S mtDNA analysis. A Consensus tree from Maximum Likelihood analysis. Scale b...
Figure 4 Example of a "catch-all" drawer with potentially dozens of different species. An effort was...
Figure 5 - Comparison of Minyomerus species in hierarchical trees. Hierarchical display of ...
The Species API of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) provides public access to tax...
Figure 4 - (A) Input visualization and (B) alignment visualization for the taxonomic concep...
Figure 4 - Fate of nodes as they move through the alignment procedure. Green, rounded boxes...
Figure 4 - BioSTIF web interface. The interface allows users to filter species occurrence p...
Figure 4 - Carl Linnaeus used candle-lit microscopes with primitive optics to examine his...
Figure 1 Create taxon name process. This process is called by the main process (Fig. 2) if the full ...
Figure 1 - Arrangement of input visualizations 1–9 (1831–1920) representing relevant prior Taxonomie...
Figure 1 - Simplified schema of Avibase primary tables, The Avibase ID table is the central element ...
Figure 3 Example of one text snippet resulting from running Biodiversity Observations Miner with O'F...
Figure 4b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from five articles published in Biodiversity Data ...
Figure 4 - OpenUp! Data Quality Toolkit annotation indicating that an identification is using a name...
Figure 2 - Taxonomic Name Resolution. Overview of the Name Resolution function of the Taxon...
Figure 4 - Results of 16S mtDNA analysis. A Consensus tree from Maximum Likelihood analysis. Scale b...
Figure 4 Example of a "catch-all" drawer with potentially dozens of different species. An effort was...