Object in Vuk-Pavlović\u27s Philosophy

U znanstvenom istraživanju neophodno razlikovanje činjeničnih danosti i smisla koji čovjek pronalazi izvodi Vuk-Pavlović realistički usmjerenom fenomenološkom analizom doživljaja. Predspoznajni slojevi, prastav i međustav, fundiraju aprioran sintetički akt zrenja bistva (Wesensschau) kojim se, kao veza činjenice i smisla, konstituira b i s t v o (eidos).•Pritom je izražena stupnjevitost: bistvo se strukturalno i smisaono temelji na predspoznajnim slojevima, kao na građi koju osmišljava. U tumačenju bistva kao k o m p l e k s i j e u kojoj su prastav i međustav inferiora služi se Vuk-Pavlović Meinongovom \u27teorijom predmeta. Njegov analitički pristup doživljaju kao i osmišljavajući sintetički zahvaćaji srodni su Husserlu, s tom razlikom što Vuk-Pavlović preciziranje fenomenološki-znanstvenog područja ne izvodi metodskim postuliranjem transcendentalnosti čiste svijesti, već spomenutim stupnjevanjem smisla, održavajući na svim stupnjevima istraživanja vezu bistvenih određenja i zazbiljnosti. Tako dobiva pluralitet određenja predmeta, diferentan u poimanju filosofijske problematike kao i u znanstvenom istraživanju, osobito u tumačenju međusobnih odnošenja egzaktnih, empiričkih i humanih znanosti.The distinction of factual givenness and sense discovered by man - the distinction which is indispensible in scientific research - Vuk Pavlović deduces from a realistically oriented phenomenological analysis of experiences. The precognitional shifts, primordial and intermediate propositions, are a grounding for the a priori synthetic act of Wesensschau by means of which the eidos is constituted as a connection of fact and sense. As a result a sequence of degrees is expressed: in terms of structured and sense the essence is founded on the precognitional shifts, as a material that garantees the sense of it. In his explanation of the essence as complexity in which the primordial and intermediate propositions are inferiora, Vuk Pavlović makes use of Meinong\u27s theory of object. His analytic approach to the experience and his sense-making synthetic access are related to Husserl\u27s, with the difference that Vuk-Pavlović does not infer the accuracy of the phenomenological field postulating methodically the trancendentality of the pure conscienceness, but giving the above mentioned degrees of sense and maintaining at each degree the connection of essential determinations and \u27reality. So he gains the plurality of object determination, relevant to the understanding of the philosophical problems and to\u27 the scientific research as well, especially to the interpretation of the mutual relationship of exact, empirical and human sciences