ANDRIĆ AS A MODEL OF THE WRITER \u27IN BETWEEN\u27 THE PARADIGMS

Ivo Andrić je pisac koji je svoj ispripovijedani svijet smjestio u \u27međuprostor\u27 dodirivanja nekoliko različitih identitetskih \u27čvrstih\u27 obrazaca. U sredinama koje su podložne čvrstim, jednoobraznim dijakronijskim uokvirivanjima unutar vlastita niza, bilo je mnogo pokušaja da se ovog autora svrsta u određenu kategoriju i pridoda mu se atribut \u27srpskog\u27, \u27hrvatskog\u27 ili \u27bošnjačkog\u27 pisca, kojega bi se, tako smjestilo unutar određene književne dijakronije. Andrić je, međutim, stvorio poziciju nepripadanja koju je prakticirao i izvan teksta, životom u mnogim gradovima, izjavama i svjetonazorom koji je uokvirio poetiku njegovih tekstova. Tako je otvorio prostor hibridizacije identiteta, postkolonijalnog propitivanja drugog i kritičke valorizacije \u27čvrstih mjesta\u27 strukturiranja sustava. Pitanje tog identiteta promatra se ovdje u odnosu na slične pojave unutar anglo-keltskih književnosti i postokolonijalne kritike, te se kao teorijska osnova nameće knjiga Homija Bhabhe Lokacija kulture u kojoj se upravo raspravlja o ovakvom tipu \u27pozicioniranja između\u27.Ivo Andric is the author who placed his narrated worlds in a space ‘in between’, in relation to different models of identification. In the environment that is framed by very clear paradigms of national identification(s), many attempts were made to frame Ivo Andric in one particular national literary history, being it Serbian, Croatian or Bosnian. At the same time Andric, with his narrative tactics, positioned himself in between the cultures and becoming the other in text and in extra-textual tactics. In this way he opened the possibilities of constructing the hybrid identity, postcolonial questioning of the other, and he also questioned the structure of tradition and authority in regards to the narration of nation. By opening the questioning of the constructed constructs in his texts and positioning, Andric also opened the possibility of language games where others are put in a position to participate. The teoretical background of this work is in Homi Bhabha\u27s book The Location of Culture and in comparing the situation of anglo-celtic \u27other\u27 within its own corpus to the positioning of post-colonial Bosnia and South Slavic environment