The Committee\u27s Report sets forth recommendations and a proposed sanctions rule. The recommendations reflect the Committee\u27s consideration and rejection of certain of the basic principles which underlie Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
The Proposed Rule to Govern Condemnation Cases in the United States District Courts has now been und...
Frivolous appeals and abusive appeal tactics contribute to the enormous workload of the federal cour...
During the 1988 Survey year, new sanction rules, effective January 1, 1989, were approved by the Cou...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
The aim of this article is to analyze some of the complex issues involved in attempting to apply the...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
The article offers information related to sanctions for frivolous civil appeals under Louisiana Code...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
For centuries, the legal profession has had rules of professional conduct. Although they were unwrit...
This 1981 Federal Judicial Center paper surveys the current state of the law with respect to sanctio...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
This article discusses and summarized the recent decisions by the New York State Court of Appeals an...
The Proposed Rule to Govern Condemnation Cases in the United States District Courts has now been und...
Frivolous appeals and abusive appeal tactics contribute to the enormous workload of the federal cour...
During the 1988 Survey year, new sanction rules, effective January 1, 1989, were approved by the Cou...
This article will argue that the standard for imposing sanctions under Rule 11 should focus on the n...
With only a small risk of overstatement, one could say that sanctions in civil litigation exploded d...
The aim of this article is to analyze some of the complex issues involved in attempting to apply the...
This article examines the Townsend decision and its interpretation and application of Rule 11 sancti...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires courts to sanction attorneys who file frivolous papers. ...
The article offers information related to sanctions for frivolous civil appeals under Louisiana Code...
The 1983 amendments to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 11, concerning sanctions for frivolous litigatio...
For centuries, the legal profession has had rules of professional conduct. Although they were unwrit...
This 1981 Federal Judicial Center paper surveys the current state of the law with respect to sanctio...
In a unanimous en banc ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Townsend v. Holman Consulting ...
The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its hist...
This article discusses and summarized the recent decisions by the New York State Court of Appeals an...
The Proposed Rule to Govern Condemnation Cases in the United States District Courts has now been und...
Frivolous appeals and abusive appeal tactics contribute to the enormous workload of the federal cour...
During the 1988 Survey year, new sanction rules, effective January 1, 1989, were approved by the Cou...