Add to ORKGThis Note discusses how many lower federal courts, in deciding when to allow state claims to be brought in federal court under the doctrine of pendant party jurisdiction, have interpreted the Supreme Court\u27s Aldinger test in a far more restrictive manner than what the Supreme Court had intended. Additionally, the Note traces the history of the doctrines of pendant jurisdiction, pendant party jurisdiction and ancillary jurisdiction. The Note also discusses of the dispute raging about the actual validity of pendant party jurisdiction, ,focusing particularly on section 1983 cases. In conclusion, the Note articulates the process and analysis a court must employ to determine if Congress has in fact negated jurisdiction
Traditionally understood, a congressional grant of federal subject matter jurisdiction alone does no...
Third-party practice as originally adopted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was one of the bo...
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court in Finley v. United States calls into question not only pe...
This Note discusses how many lower federal courts, in deciding when to allow state claims to be brou...
Pendent and ancillary jurisdiction are necessary judicial creations for the just and efficient adjud...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
Late in 1990, Congress passed a statute that confers on the district courts “supplemental jurisdicti...
In Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger the Supreme Court last Term addressed for the first time ...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
This paper examines the conditions under which Congress passes jurisdiction-granting legislation, le...
The ability of a federal court hearing a federal cause of action to assert jurisdiction over a nonre...
This note argues that the Eighth Circuit\u27s decision to claim jurisdiction in Industrial Wire Prod...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that for purposes of federal jurisdiction arising un...
This Article explains why courts treat subject-matter jurisdiction as sacrosanct, demonstrates why t...
Traditionally understood, a congressional grant of federal subject matter jurisdiction alone does no...
Third-party practice as originally adopted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was one of the bo...
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court in Finley v. United States calls into question not only pe...
This Note discusses how many lower federal courts, in deciding when to allow state claims to be brou...
Pendent and ancillary jurisdiction are necessary judicial creations for the just and efficient adjud...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
Late in 1990, Congress passed a statute that confers on the district courts “supplemental jurisdicti...
In Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger the Supreme Court last Term addressed for the first time ...
The purpose of this Article is to locate the sources of jurisdictional doctrine. A coherent theory o...
This paper examines the conditions under which Congress passes jurisdiction-granting legislation, le...
The ability of a federal court hearing a federal cause of action to assert jurisdiction over a nonre...
This note argues that the Eighth Circuit\u27s decision to claim jurisdiction in Industrial Wire Prod...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that for purposes of federal jurisdiction arising un...
This Article explains why courts treat subject-matter jurisdiction as sacrosanct, demonstrates why t...
Traditionally understood, a congressional grant of federal subject matter jurisdiction alone does no...
Third-party practice as originally adopted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was one of the bo...
The approach adopted by the Supreme Court in Finley v. United States calls into question not only pe...