In this paper, I consider the problem of truth telling through the notion of parrhesia as developed and explicated in Foucault’s last lectures at the College de France (1982–1983 and 1983–1984) and the figure of the pariah that runs throughout Arendt’s work. In tracing connections and tensions in the way the two thinkers explore questions and dilemmas around the courage to tell the truth in philosophy and politics, I look into the current climate within the UK academia, where there is a lot of ambivalence about whether people mean what they say or say what they mean anymore. In a Foucauldian mode of inquiry, I raise the question: what is the role of the academic when going through ‘dark times’, vis-à-vis questions of truth telling; what are...
Post-truth was the OED word of the year in 2016, defined as ‘relating to or denoting circumstances i...
While Foucault’s work on biopolitics continues to inspire diverse studies in a variety of discipline...
In 1967 Arendt published an article on ‘Truth and Politics’ in the New Yorker in response to histori...
This paper is devoted to an examination of Foucault's changing notion of truth in relation to the ch...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investi...
Michel Foucault’s later concept of parrhesia presents a number of potential interpretive problems wi...
Contemporary debates about post‐truth politics have raised the question of the complicity...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investig...
This essay argues that in order fully to appreciate the reorientation of Foucault‟s lecture courses...
This paper provides an introduction to the history and practice of lying in public life. The paper a...
Considering the issue of power in Foucault will always lead to comments on the issue of knowledge an...
Parrhesia — the practice of truth-telling — was adapted to various ancient legal, political, philoso...
Responding to ongoing concerns that Michel Foucault’s influential governmentality analytics fail to ...
In this paper, Vaccaro aims to interrogate the political value of truth. Moving from Hannah Arendt ...
In this dissertation, I defend an interpretation of Foucault’s parrhesiast (those who speak truth to...
Post-truth was the OED word of the year in 2016, defined as ‘relating to or denoting circumstances i...
While Foucault’s work on biopolitics continues to inspire diverse studies in a variety of discipline...
In 1967 Arendt published an article on ‘Truth and Politics’ in the New Yorker in response to histori...
This paper is devoted to an examination of Foucault's changing notion of truth in relation to the ch...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investi...
Michel Foucault’s later concept of parrhesia presents a number of potential interpretive problems wi...
Contemporary debates about post‐truth politics have raised the question of the complicity...
In an interview a year before his death, Foucault confessed that his real quarry was not an investig...
This essay argues that in order fully to appreciate the reorientation of Foucault‟s lecture courses...
This paper provides an introduction to the history and practice of lying in public life. The paper a...
Considering the issue of power in Foucault will always lead to comments on the issue of knowledge an...
Parrhesia — the practice of truth-telling — was adapted to various ancient legal, political, philoso...
Responding to ongoing concerns that Michel Foucault’s influential governmentality analytics fail to ...
In this paper, Vaccaro aims to interrogate the political value of truth. Moving from Hannah Arendt ...
In this dissertation, I defend an interpretation of Foucault’s parrhesiast (those who speak truth to...
Post-truth was the OED word of the year in 2016, defined as ‘relating to or denoting circumstances i...
While Foucault’s work on biopolitics continues to inspire diverse studies in a variety of discipline...
In 1967 Arendt published an article on ‘Truth and Politics’ in the New Yorker in response to histori...