Causality and critical theory: nature's order in Adorno, Cartwright and Bhaskar

In this paper I argue that Theodor W. Adorno's philosophy of freedom needs an ontological picture of the world. Adorno does not make his view of natural order explicit, but I suggest it could be neither the chaotic nor the strictly determined ontological images common to idealism and positivism, and that it would have to make intelligible the possibility both of human freedom and of critical social science. I consider two possible candidates, Nancy Cartwright's ‘patchwork of laws’, and Roy Bhaskar's critical realism. Arguing that Cartwright's position conflicts with the spirit of Adorno's philosophy, I suggest that Bhaskar's realism is compatible with and to a significant extent implicit in Adorno's position. Whilst Adorno is clearly not a critical realist, Bhaskar's position does provide the best overall account of the ontological commitments of Adorno's critical theory. It becomes possible in turn to locate Bhaskar's arguments in a broader critical tradition and give fuller expression to the concerns that structure his work, in particular by locating the epistemic fallacy in the narrative account of the natural history of subjective reason and its tendency towards ‘identity thinking’. The discussion goes on to consider the interdependence of reason, nature and freedom in the idea of emancipatory critique, confirming the deeper affinities between critical realism and critical theory