There is a considerable gap between the law and knowledge regarding the efficacy of state-imposed sanctions to achieve several key sentencing objectives. Two sentencing objectives which often carry considerable weight in the sentencing calculus are rehabilitation and specific deterrence, despite the fact that neither has been proven to be attainable. This article examines the empirical data on whether specific deterrence and rehabilitation are attainable, and consequently whether they should be retained or abolished as sentencing objectives. <br /
This article is an exposition of the application of deterrence in Malawian sentencing jurisprudence....
Some theorists argue that a justification of criminal punishment presupposes a theory of state power...
Deterrence has long been considered one of the most important goals of both tort law and criminal la...
In the past several years, there has been an extended dialogue in the literature concerning the ques...
A lively debate began in the late 1970\u27s on the topic of criminal sentencing. A major attack was ...
This study examines deterrence as a threat communication process. Deterrence as a system of informat...
In this article we derive the mix of criminal sanctions—choosing among prison, parole, and probation...
The evidence in support of the deterrent effect of the certainty of punishment is far more consisten...
Sentencing outcomes are often marked by a considerable degree ofunpredictability. A key reason for t...
Having a criminal justice system that imposes sanctions no doubt does deter criminal conduct. But av...
Stafford and Warr (1993) reconceptualized general and specific deterrence into a single theory in wh...
This paper examines the consequences of the overlap between punishment and rehabilitation practices,...
The behavioral sciences increasingly call into question the assumption of criminal law\u27s ex ante ...
For the past several decades, the deterrence of crime has been a centerpiece of criminal law reform....
desert ' should be the primary aim of sentencing policy and that the aims of deterrence and reh...
This article is an exposition of the application of deterrence in Malawian sentencing jurisprudence....
Some theorists argue that a justification of criminal punishment presupposes a theory of state power...
Deterrence has long been considered one of the most important goals of both tort law and criminal la...
In the past several years, there has been an extended dialogue in the literature concerning the ques...
A lively debate began in the late 1970\u27s on the topic of criminal sentencing. A major attack was ...
This study examines deterrence as a threat communication process. Deterrence as a system of informat...
In this article we derive the mix of criminal sanctions—choosing among prison, parole, and probation...
The evidence in support of the deterrent effect of the certainty of punishment is far more consisten...
Sentencing outcomes are often marked by a considerable degree ofunpredictability. A key reason for t...
Having a criminal justice system that imposes sanctions no doubt does deter criminal conduct. But av...
Stafford and Warr (1993) reconceptualized general and specific deterrence into a single theory in wh...
This paper examines the consequences of the overlap between punishment and rehabilitation practices,...
The behavioral sciences increasingly call into question the assumption of criminal law\u27s ex ante ...
For the past several decades, the deterrence of crime has been a centerpiece of criminal law reform....
desert ' should be the primary aim of sentencing policy and that the aims of deterrence and reh...
This article is an exposition of the application of deterrence in Malawian sentencing jurisprudence....
Some theorists argue that a justification of criminal punishment presupposes a theory of state power...
Deterrence has long been considered one of the most important goals of both tort law and criminal la...