The article argues that Polanyi was a likely source of influence on the theory of science that Kuhn developed in his The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). The striking similarity between Kuhn’s idea of incommensurability and Polanyi’s rendering of scientific controversy in Personal Knowledge is featured here, and is used to expose a tension between Polanyi’s notions of scientific controversy and unfolding truth.<br /
Moti Mizrahi has argued that Thomas Kuhn does not have a good argument for the incommensurability of...
Thomas Kuhn' s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is arguably the most influential work in the ...
Historians and sociologists of science often identify the efflorescence of social stud ies of scienc...
My purpose is to examine how Kuhn and Polanyi might be mutually supportive and corrective so as to j...
After commending Moleski for his excellent study, I focus attention on three areas that merit furthe...
Kuhn and Feyerabend have little to say about the thought of Michael Polanyi, and the secondary liter...
My essay will be divided as follows: #1 Analysis of Thomas Kuhn's notion of sci...
This is a book review of Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis (Eds.), Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientif...
In the paper I will, first, address certain apparent tensions in relation to Kuhn’s legacy in the hi...
Michael Polanyi argues in Personal Knowledge (1958) that conceptual frameworks involved in major sci...
This article takes issue with Kuhn’s description of the ‘Aristotle experience,’ an event that took p...
Kuhn and Feyerabend have little to say about the thought of Michael Polanyi, and the secondary liter...
Moti Mizrahi has argued that Thomas Kuhn does not have a good argument for the incommensurability of...
Thomas Kuhn' s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is arguably the most influential work in the ...
Historians and sociologists of science often identify the efflorescence of social stud ies of scienc...
My purpose is to examine how Kuhn and Polanyi might be mutually supportive and corrective so as to j...
After commending Moleski for his excellent study, I focus attention on three areas that merit furthe...
Kuhn and Feyerabend have little to say about the thought of Michael Polanyi, and the secondary liter...
My essay will be divided as follows: #1 Analysis of Thomas Kuhn's notion of sci...
This is a book review of Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis (Eds.), Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientif...
In the paper I will, first, address certain apparent tensions in relation to Kuhn’s legacy in the hi...
Michael Polanyi argues in Personal Knowledge (1958) that conceptual frameworks involved in major sci...
This article takes issue with Kuhn’s description of the ‘Aristotle experience,’ an event that took p...
Kuhn and Feyerabend have little to say about the thought of Michael Polanyi, and the secondary liter...
Moti Mizrahi has argued that Thomas Kuhn does not have a good argument for the incommensurability of...
Thomas Kuhn' s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is arguably the most influential work in the ...
Historians and sociologists of science often identify the efflorescence of social stud ies of scienc...