Traditionally, courts have presumed that commercial parties intend to create legal relations when entering into agreements and that family members do not. Although not without their critics, until recently these twin presumptions appeared immutable. This article examines the trend to reduce the emphasis on these presumptions by some members of the judiciary in the selection of Australian and New Zealand cases and proposes that as a consequence of the High Court\u27s decision in Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95 the intention to create legal relations presumptions should no longer be used in any context. It concludes by considering the implications for this area of law.<br /
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
Despite what the realists and other critics might say, Australian judges in particular, do take the ...
This article examines the difficulties with the presumption/rebuttal model to assess intention to cr...
This paper is partially to refute the submissions by Gulati’s article recently published on Beijing ...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 349-386.Introduction -- Chapter One. Background and literatur...
Cases continue to emanate from the courts that appear to show some ignorance of the requirement to e...
Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of...
This Note examines the English judiciary’s reluctance to fully accept marital agreements, and the di...
This article examines how the Family Court views the circumstances of relationships when deciding wh...
The New Zealand Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001 signified a radical shift in New Zealand...
While Australia awaits a national regime for property adjustment following the breakdown of a de fac...
A family law financial agreement made pursuant to pt VIIIA for parties to a marriage and pt VIIIAB f...
Family law is simultaneously moving toward and away from formalist decision making. Examining family...
Civil relations at its core contain regulations for the transfer or circulation of certain material ...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
Despite what the realists and other critics might say, Australian judges in particular, do take the ...
This article examines the difficulties with the presumption/rebuttal model to assess intention to cr...
This paper is partially to refute the submissions by Gulati’s article recently published on Beijing ...
Theoretical thesis.Bibliography: pages 349-386.Introduction -- Chapter One. Background and literatur...
Cases continue to emanate from the courts that appear to show some ignorance of the requirement to e...
Privity and the inter-twined notion of consideration are key features of the classical Common law of...
This Note examines the English judiciary’s reluctance to fully accept marital agreements, and the di...
This article examines how the Family Court views the circumstances of relationships when deciding wh...
The New Zealand Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001 signified a radical shift in New Zealand...
While Australia awaits a national regime for property adjustment following the breakdown of a de fac...
A family law financial agreement made pursuant to pt VIIIA for parties to a marriage and pt VIIIAB f...
Family law is simultaneously moving toward and away from formalist decision making. Examining family...
Civil relations at its core contain regulations for the transfer or circulation of certain material ...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
Despite what the realists and other critics might say, Australian judges in particular, do take the ...