Everyone agrees that mens rea is relevant to fault. The maxim actus non fit reus nisi mens sit rea has been around for centuries.1 According to foundational principles of the criminal law, it is normally not enough to support a conviction that D perpetrates the actus reus. Neither should it be. Causing harm to another person may be unfortunate, but the moral turpitude associated with a criminal conviction requires some element of fault. And to show that, we need mens rea
According to a famous brocardo (i.e., an ancient legal maxim), “Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit r...
The current criminal law of England and Wales does not assess mens rea in a consistent manner. The l...
In rape cases involving physical violence or express threats of physical harm, proof of the actus re...
Mens Rea, or “guilty mind,” marks a central distinguishing feature of criminal law. An injury caused...
Many criminal lawyers, judges, and professors see the distinction between actus reus and mens rea as...
“Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea” which means an act does not constitute crime unless done wi...
Apart from those offences that are defined to exclude such considerations, the commission of a crime...
This article focuses on Tony Smith's criticisms of criminal lawyers' use of the concept of actus reu...
In the first part of this Article, the Author briefly outlines the conceptual underpinnings of the c...
Abstract: In this essay, and with the purpose of better understanding the fundamental elements on wh...
This is a thesis about criminal culpability and the need for a moral theory of criminal fault. The...
This article explores the use of mens rea terms in the criminal general part. We contend the current...
It is a foundational, but underappreciated principle of criminal liability that being guilty of a cr...
This article explores the problem of seemingly bad acts that go unpunished because the actor lacked ...
The doctrine of mens rea can be expressed in this way: MRP: If A is culpable for performing phi, the...
According to a famous brocardo (i.e., an ancient legal maxim), “Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit r...
The current criminal law of England and Wales does not assess mens rea in a consistent manner. The l...
In rape cases involving physical violence or express threats of physical harm, proof of the actus re...
Mens Rea, or “guilty mind,” marks a central distinguishing feature of criminal law. An injury caused...
Many criminal lawyers, judges, and professors see the distinction between actus reus and mens rea as...
“Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea” which means an act does not constitute crime unless done wi...
Apart from those offences that are defined to exclude such considerations, the commission of a crime...
This article focuses on Tony Smith's criticisms of criminal lawyers' use of the concept of actus reu...
In the first part of this Article, the Author briefly outlines the conceptual underpinnings of the c...
Abstract: In this essay, and with the purpose of better understanding the fundamental elements on wh...
This is a thesis about criminal culpability and the need for a moral theory of criminal fault. The...
This article explores the use of mens rea terms in the criminal general part. We contend the current...
It is a foundational, but underappreciated principle of criminal liability that being guilty of a cr...
This article explores the problem of seemingly bad acts that go unpunished because the actor lacked ...
The doctrine of mens rea can be expressed in this way: MRP: If A is culpable for performing phi, the...
According to a famous brocardo (i.e., an ancient legal maxim), “Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit r...
The current criminal law of England and Wales does not assess mens rea in a consistent manner. The l...
In rape cases involving physical violence or express threats of physical harm, proof of the actus re...