Current models of decision making under risk assume access to the absolute magnitudes of gamble attributes. The two experiments presented here provide evidence that decisions under risk are based, in addition, on the context of the decision. In Experiment 1 the set of options offered as certainty equivalents was shown to determine the value of simple gambles of the form “p chance of £x”. Experiment 2 employed a novel procedure where the payment structure was such that it was optimal for participants to provide truthful certainty equivalents. Again, the context provided by the set of certainty equivalents influenced the choice of certainty equivalent
In one experiment we studied the extent to which theories of judgment, decision-making and memory ca...
In three experiments we studied the extent to which theories of decision-making and memory can predi...
<p>When the gamble was lower in expected value than the certain win, participants chose the risky op...
A series of experiments is used to investigate the extent to which valuation of a risky prospect is ...
It has long been assumed in economic theory that multi-attribute decisions involving several attribu...
We consider the existence problem of errors in decision making pro-cesses under risk from a set-theo...
Many economic theories of decision making assume that people evaluate options independently of other...
Abstract—This article investigates choices between gambles and amounts of money to explore two issue...
Choice is viewed as a derived, not a primitive, concept. Individual gambles are assigned subjective ...
The leading normative (von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947) and alternative psychological theories (e.g....
This article develops a parsimonious descriptive model of individual choice and valuation in the kin...
Understanding human behavior from the perspective of normative and descriptive theories depends on h...
Research on preference reversals has demonstrated a disproportionate influence of outcome probabilit...
In three experiments we studied the extent to which theories of decision-making and memory can predi...
The leading normative (von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947) and alternative psychological theories (e.g....
In one experiment we studied the extent to which theories of judgment, decision-making and memory ca...
In three experiments we studied the extent to which theories of decision-making and memory can predi...
<p>When the gamble was lower in expected value than the certain win, participants chose the risky op...
A series of experiments is used to investigate the extent to which valuation of a risky prospect is ...
It has long been assumed in economic theory that multi-attribute decisions involving several attribu...
We consider the existence problem of errors in decision making pro-cesses under risk from a set-theo...
Many economic theories of decision making assume that people evaluate options independently of other...
Abstract—This article investigates choices between gambles and amounts of money to explore two issue...
Choice is viewed as a derived, not a primitive, concept. Individual gambles are assigned subjective ...
The leading normative (von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947) and alternative psychological theories (e.g....
This article develops a parsimonious descriptive model of individual choice and valuation in the kin...
Understanding human behavior from the perspective of normative and descriptive theories depends on h...
Research on preference reversals has demonstrated a disproportionate influence of outcome probabilit...
In three experiments we studied the extent to which theories of decision-making and memory can predi...
The leading normative (von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947) and alternative psychological theories (e.g....
In one experiment we studied the extent to which theories of judgment, decision-making and memory ca...
In three experiments we studied the extent to which theories of decision-making and memory can predi...
<p>When the gamble was lower in expected value than the certain win, participants chose the risky op...