Mainstream macroeconomics has pursued .micro founded.models based on the explicit optimization by representative agents. The result has been a long and wasteful detour. But elements of the Lucas critique are relevant, also for heterodox economists. Challenging common heterodox views on microeconomics and formalization, this paper argues that (i) economic models should not be based purely on empirically observed regularities,(ii) heterodox economists must be able to tell an integrated story about goal-oriented micro behavior in a specific macro environment, and (iii)relatively simple analytical models have an essential role to play
Most observers would agree that a healthy field of study needs diversity and a vibrant and open mark...
This paper argues that the microfoundations programme can be understood as an implementation of an u...
This article focuses on a broad distinction within economic thinking and the methodological misconc...
Mainstream macroeconomics has pursued micro founded models based on the explicit optimization by rep...
This paper examines underlying methodological commitments in orthodox and heterodox approaches to mi...
Pluralism is frequently supported by heterodox economists, but their rationale for it is not always ...
The purpose here is to revisit the role of pluralism in heterodox economics and to make the case for...
John King has made challenging contributions to our thinking in many areas. This paper focuses on tw...
The resolution of the controversy over the microfoundations of macroeconomics is important to hetero...
Economic science has – lamented by some, applauded by others – turned into a monistic discipline. In...
Pluralism is the concept that there is no single methodology that is always the correct one for disc...
It is rarely underlined that Lucas's work contains epistemological considerations on the scope and m...
This paper constitutes the first chapter in my work-in-progress manuscript, Microeconomic Theory: A...
Conventional economics maintains that a critical test of the veracity of robust economic theory is i...
Microeconomic Principles and Problems offers a comprehensive introduction to all major perspectives ...
Most observers would agree that a healthy field of study needs diversity and a vibrant and open mark...
This paper argues that the microfoundations programme can be understood as an implementation of an u...
This article focuses on a broad distinction within economic thinking and the methodological misconc...
Mainstream macroeconomics has pursued micro founded models based on the explicit optimization by rep...
This paper examines underlying methodological commitments in orthodox and heterodox approaches to mi...
Pluralism is frequently supported by heterodox economists, but their rationale for it is not always ...
The purpose here is to revisit the role of pluralism in heterodox economics and to make the case for...
John King has made challenging contributions to our thinking in many areas. This paper focuses on tw...
The resolution of the controversy over the microfoundations of macroeconomics is important to hetero...
Economic science has – lamented by some, applauded by others – turned into a monistic discipline. In...
Pluralism is the concept that there is no single methodology that is always the correct one for disc...
It is rarely underlined that Lucas's work contains epistemological considerations on the scope and m...
This paper constitutes the first chapter in my work-in-progress manuscript, Microeconomic Theory: A...
Conventional economics maintains that a critical test of the veracity of robust economic theory is i...
Microeconomic Principles and Problems offers a comprehensive introduction to all major perspectives ...
Most observers would agree that a healthy field of study needs diversity and a vibrant and open mark...
This paper argues that the microfoundations programme can be understood as an implementation of an u...
This article focuses on a broad distinction within economic thinking and the methodological misconc...