Previous research has shown that the effect of fiscal centralization is to reduce lobbying. However empirical evidence suggests that this is not always the case. This paper attempts to explain the empirical evidence in a two-jurisdiction political economy model of endogenous lobby formation and policy determination. We measure lobbying in two ways: (i) the number of lobbies formed under the two settings and (ii) their impact on policy decisions. We show that, contrary to the predictions of the preference dilution effect, the effect of centralization on lobbying are ambiguous with respect to both measures of lobbies
In this paper, we present a citizen-candidate model of representative democracy with endogenous lobb...
International audienceWe address the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making...
Philipps-University of Marburg We propose and test a positive model of fiscal federalism in which ce...
Previous research has shown that the e¤ect of …scal centralization is to reduce lobbying. However em...
Previous research has shown that if countries ”merge”, (i.e. move to centralized policy choices) the...
Previous research has shown that if countries "merge", (i.e. move to centralized policy choices) the...
Which government functions should be decentralized (resp. centralized) once lobbying behavior is tak...
Which government functions should be decentralized (resp. centralized) once lobbying behavior is tak...
Difficulties faced by the Economic and Monetary Union have strengthened the position of those who ad...
We study lobbying behavior by firms in a two-region economy, with either centralized or decen-traliz...
This paper analyzes the effects of legislative bargaining in the EU on public goodsprovision and lob...
In a theoretical model we show that centralization and enlargement may cause lobbying expenditures t...
We develop a model of legislative lobbying where policy proposals are endogenous. We show that a pol...
This paper analyzes endogenous lobbying over a unidimensional policy issue. Individuals differ in po...
We present a theory that explains the formation of special interest groups lobbying policy makers. L...
In this paper, we present a citizen-candidate model of representative democracy with endogenous lobb...
International audienceWe address the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making...
Philipps-University of Marburg We propose and test a positive model of fiscal federalism in which ce...
Previous research has shown that the e¤ect of …scal centralization is to reduce lobbying. However em...
Previous research has shown that if countries ”merge”, (i.e. move to centralized policy choices) the...
Previous research has shown that if countries "merge", (i.e. move to centralized policy choices) the...
Which government functions should be decentralized (resp. centralized) once lobbying behavior is tak...
Which government functions should be decentralized (resp. centralized) once lobbying behavior is tak...
Difficulties faced by the Economic and Monetary Union have strengthened the position of those who ad...
We study lobbying behavior by firms in a two-region economy, with either centralized or decen-traliz...
This paper analyzes the effects of legislative bargaining in the EU on public goodsprovision and lob...
In a theoretical model we show that centralization and enlargement may cause lobbying expenditures t...
We develop a model of legislative lobbying where policy proposals are endogenous. We show that a pol...
This paper analyzes endogenous lobbying over a unidimensional policy issue. Individuals differ in po...
We present a theory that explains the formation of special interest groups lobbying policy makers. L...
In this paper, we present a citizen-candidate model of representative democracy with endogenous lobb...
International audienceWe address the trade-off between centralized and decentralized decision making...
Philipps-University of Marburg We propose and test a positive model of fiscal federalism in which ce...