Near infrared spectroscopy in large animals: optical pathlengh and influence of hair covering and epidemal pigmentation

peer reviewedThe effects of epidermal pigmentation and hair covering on the relative transparency of various animal tissues to near infrared (NIR) light were examined, and the pathlengths of NIR light through tissues at four wavelengths in the NIR range were subsequently determined. Black hair covering and black or dark-coloured hooves prevented NIR light from penetration sufficient for conduction of pathlength or NIR spectroscopy measurements. Non-pigmented hair covering of the head did not appear to be a barrier to successful NIR light transmission. Tissues sufficiently transparent to NIR light had the differential pathlength factor (DPF, i.e. the ratio of the observed light pathlength and the geometric light source-detector separation) of NIR light determined by intensity modulated spectroscopy at the wavelengths 744, 806, 834 and 860 nm. Horse gluteal muscles had DPFs of 6.2, 6.2, 6.0, and 5.6, whereas forelimb muscles had DPF of 4.7, 4.4, 4.5 and 3.9 at the respective wavelengths. Sheep heads had DPF of 7.2 +/- 0.3, 5.8 +/- 0.5, 5.5 +/- 0.4 and 4.4 +/- 0.6 (+/- SEM) for the above respective wavelengths, of which the pathlengths all differed significantly from the other, except for between 806 and 834 nm, and 834 and 860 nm. The DPF of horse hooves were 4.8 +/- 0.1, 4.8 +/- 0.1, 4.7 +/- 0.1 and 4.4 +/- 0.1 (SEM) for the above noted wavelengths, of which the pathlength at 744 and 806 nm differed from the pathlength at 860 nm (P>0.05). These results show that NIRS is possible through lighter pigmented hair and epidermal tissues, and provide DPFs of horse feet and muscle and the sheep head that enables quantitative NIRS in these species