Contiguity of the research work by Roman Jakobson and Yury Rozhdestvensky in terms of method and material

The goal of this paper is to compare R. Jakobson’s and Yu. Rozhdestvensky’s typological investigations in terms of material and method in selective thematic survey. The content of the selection is conditioned by the complimentary component of the themes developed in the texts of both the scholars. The survey of Jakobson’s and Rozhdestvensky’s research works demonstrate the complimentary character of arguments of both the scholars in formulating the principle on limitation of the material of research and range of application of this principle: the linguistic procedure on revealing specific correlations among systemic features of the language and their speech realization in terms of the language structure is applicable to all the objects of linguistics which are in the context of the concept of the unit of structural-functional divisibility. Investigation pathos of both the scholars is to reveal language forms that play the function of casual relations among studying cultural significance of linguistic systems and studying typology of texts. Folklore, poetical organization of speech, material of language sign, nomination of semiotic phenomena are prioritized spheres on revealing these language forms