Add to ORKGA four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong to eat meat? M and V review the standard arguments plus a few new ones. Part 3 discusses the idea that creatures have different degrees of consciousness, the sense that certain animal welfare positions "sound crazy", and the role of empathy in moral judgment
This paper is a teaching tool which instructors of animal ethics may assign to students to help them...
Unlike other ethical arguments for veganism, the argument advanced is not predicated on the wrongnes...
Ethical vegetarians maintain that vegetarianism is morally required. The principal reasons offered i...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
Two philosophy students, M and V, discuss the ethics of meat consumption. Standard arguments on both...
The philosophical literature may seem to be replete with arguments for vegetarianism based on harm t...
The purpose of this article, which takes the form of a dialogue between a vegetarian and a meat eate...
This well chosen collection of essays written by recognized scholars addresses many of the intriguin...
It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from drivi...
This paper is a teaching tool which instructors of animal ethics may assign to students to help them...
Unlike other ethical arguments for veganism, the argument advanced is not predicated on the wrongnes...
Ethical vegetarians maintain that vegetarianism is morally required. The principal reasons offered i...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong ...
Two philosophy students, M and V, discuss the ethics of meat consumption. Standard arguments on both...
The philosophical literature may seem to be replete with arguments for vegetarianism based on harm t...
The purpose of this article, which takes the form of a dialogue between a vegetarian and a meat eate...
This well chosen collection of essays written by recognized scholars addresses many of the intriguin...
It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from drivi...
This paper is a teaching tool which instructors of animal ethics may assign to students to help them...
Unlike other ethical arguments for veganism, the argument advanced is not predicated on the wrongnes...
Ethical vegetarians maintain that vegetarianism is morally required. The principal reasons offered i...