A Study of Resource Co-managerment in Aboriginal Areas from the Viewpoint of Collaborative Governance : the Case of Tibaun Tribe,Sinyi Township,Nantou County

[[abstract]]依據原住民族基本法第22條規定所訂定的「原住民族地區資源共同管理辦法」將原住民族地區資源共同管理機制的功能定位在「諮詢及提供建言」，如此諮詢式的共同管理機制與原住民族期望能參與決策、獲得實質利益…等等的想像，存在著不小的落差。本研究參採公共行政學術界治理理論中「公私協力夥伴關係」觀點，借用Ansell and Gash (2008)的協力治理模型以及Carlsson and Berkes (2005)對於共同管理定義的描述，嘗試建構協力式共同管理機制；在林務局相關法令及業務範圍之下，以南投縣信義鄉雙龍部落為研究對象，探討在現行的法令及共管機制之下，林業主管機關與原住民部落如何秉持對生態永續發展的共同願景，藉由協力過程六種因素的持續運作與良性循環，補強現行諮詢式共同管理機制的品質，並期望以協力式網絡關係的治理，促進權力的分享，逐步增進雙方互信、互惠及互賴的夥伴關係。 本研究採用質性研究的模式，首先採用｢文獻分析法｣來建構協力式共同管理機制，其次利用｢深度訪談法｣來蒐集林務局與雙龍部落原住民受訪者對於協力式共同管理機制的想法與意見，以嚴謹的態度來歸納分析資料，並與研究目的與文獻產生對話，然後依據研究發現，針對協力式共同管理機制運作的各個要素，提出具體的實務上的做法，最後依據研究過程的心得，提出具體的實務上的建議。[[abstract]]According to the requirements of the “Regulations for Resources Co-Management for Aboriginal Areas” of Article 22 of the Indigenous Peoples Basic Law, the co-management system for resources in aboriginal areas has been positioned as “consultation and providing suggestions”. However, there exists considerable differences between such consultative co-management systems and the expectations of indigenous groups to participate in decision-making and prospects such as acquiring substantial benefits. This study adopts the “Public-Private Partnerships” perspective of the Governance Theory from public administration academics, borrowing from the Collaborative Governance Model of Ansell and Gash (2008) and the description of Co-Management by Carlsson and Berkes (2005) in attempt construct a collaborative co-management system. Under the relevant laws and regulations and the scope of the Forestry Bureau, this study focuses on the Tibaun Tribe of Nantou County Xinyi Township as the research subject. This study investigates how forestry authorities and indigenous tribes aims to achieve the mutual goals for ecological sustainable development under existing laws and regulations and co-management systems through the continuous operation and virtuous cycle of the six factors of the collaborative process in order to improve quality of the existing consultative co-management system, facilitate power-sharing and eventually building partnerships of mutual trust, benefit and interdependency through governance under collaborative network relationships. This study implements the qualitative research method, firstly by using the “Literature Analysis” method to construct a collaborative co-management system, then the “In-Depth Interview” method is used to collect the thoughts and opinions of the Forestry Bureau and Tibaun Tribe indigenous people towards a collaborative co-management system. The data is then organized and analyzed with prudence, dialogues are created between the research objective and the literature, and according to the research findings, practical applications are proposed in respect of each element for the operation of the collaborative co-management system. Finally, practical recommendations are specifically proposed according to conclusions drawn from the research process.[[note]]碩