The current debate surrounding the Medical Innovation Bill purports to be aimed at improving the normative framework to the extent that innovation is more likely. A closer look at the mechanisms of the proposed legislation and a more detailed assessment of the reasons given for initiating the legislative process in this instance reveal that the Bill seem to rest on a significant misunderstanding of the current law of medical negligence. This article analyses the provisions of the Bill, puts them into the wider context of medical negligence and critically reviews the utility of the proposed legislation. © The Author(s) 2014
The present article seeks to explore previously undiscussed differences between the negligence and s...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73130/1/j.1748-720X.1981.tb01913.x.pd
Medical negligence is a topic in tort law which has been widely discussed as good, affordable health...
Objective: This paper aims to demonstrate that any suggestion that there is a need for specific inno...
This thesis has proposed a fourth model of contact between patient and doctor, that of innovation. T...
open access articleIn 2014, Lord Saatchi launched his ultimately unsuccessful Medical Innovation Bil...
This special issue features papers culminating from a six seminar ESRC series ‘Liability versus inno...
Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill, which has been reintroduced into parliament, is a deeply fla...
This article examines the implications of the foregoing competing claims from a U.S. legal perspecti...
In 2014, Lord Saatchi launched his ultimately unsuccessful Medical Innovation Bill in the UK. Its la...
This thesis has attempted the ambitious task of trying to identify, diagnose and suggest treatment ...
This essay will interrogate the legality of medical patents, arguing that one ought to reject the tr...
The focus of the debates surrounding the Medical Innovation Bill and Access to Medical Treatments (I...
The focus of the debates surrounding the Medical Innovation Bill and Access to Medical Treatments (I...
Medical negligence claims have increased significantly over the last number of years. The trend is s...
The present article seeks to explore previously undiscussed differences between the negligence and s...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73130/1/j.1748-720X.1981.tb01913.x.pd
Medical negligence is a topic in tort law which has been widely discussed as good, affordable health...
Objective: This paper aims to demonstrate that any suggestion that there is a need for specific inno...
This thesis has proposed a fourth model of contact between patient and doctor, that of innovation. T...
open access articleIn 2014, Lord Saatchi launched his ultimately unsuccessful Medical Innovation Bil...
This special issue features papers culminating from a six seminar ESRC series ‘Liability versus inno...
Lord Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill, which has been reintroduced into parliament, is a deeply fla...
This article examines the implications of the foregoing competing claims from a U.S. legal perspecti...
In 2014, Lord Saatchi launched his ultimately unsuccessful Medical Innovation Bill in the UK. Its la...
This thesis has attempted the ambitious task of trying to identify, diagnose and suggest treatment ...
This essay will interrogate the legality of medical patents, arguing that one ought to reject the tr...
The focus of the debates surrounding the Medical Innovation Bill and Access to Medical Treatments (I...
The focus of the debates surrounding the Medical Innovation Bill and Access to Medical Treatments (I...
Medical negligence claims have increased significantly over the last number of years. The trend is s...
The present article seeks to explore previously undiscussed differences between the negligence and s...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73130/1/j.1748-720X.1981.tb01913.x.pd
Medical negligence is a topic in tort law which has been widely discussed as good, affordable health...