Studies suggest a bias against the publication of null (p \u3e .05) results. Instead of significance, we advocate reporting effect sizes and confidence intervals, and using replication studies. If statistical tests are used, power tests should accompany them
We discuss problems the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm poses for replication a...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
Journals tend to publish only statistically significant evidence, creating a scientific record that ...
Studies suggest a bias against the publication of null (p \u3e .05) results. Instead of significance...
Editorial procedures in the social and biomedical sciences are said to promote studies that falsely ...
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) has had and continues to have an adverse effect on marke...
Publication bias can arise from investigators not submitting studies with outcomes that do not suppo...
peer-reviewedProblemification: Over-reliance on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is one o...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
Background Despite regular criticisms of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), a focus on tes...
At least twenty‐three journals in the social sciences purportedly require authors to report effect s...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
As I discussed in my last editorial,1 there are four criteria for judging whether a paper should be ...
ABSTRACT—The statistic prep estimates the probability of replicating an effect. It captures traditio...
ABSTRACT Heightened competition for funding and increased pressure to publish in high-impact journa...
We discuss problems the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm poses for replication a...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
Journals tend to publish only statistically significant evidence, creating a scientific record that ...
Studies suggest a bias against the publication of null (p \u3e .05) results. Instead of significance...
Editorial procedures in the social and biomedical sciences are said to promote studies that falsely ...
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) has had and continues to have an adverse effect on marke...
Publication bias can arise from investigators not submitting studies with outcomes that do not suppo...
peer-reviewedProblemification: Over-reliance on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is one o...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
Background Despite regular criticisms of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), a focus on tes...
At least twenty‐three journals in the social sciences purportedly require authors to report effect s...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
As I discussed in my last editorial,1 there are four criteria for judging whether a paper should be ...
ABSTRACT—The statistic prep estimates the probability of replicating an effect. It captures traditio...
ABSTRACT Heightened competition for funding and increased pressure to publish in high-impact journa...
We discuss problems the null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) paradigm poses for replication a...
What are the statistical practices of articles published in journals with a high impact factor? Are ...
Journals tend to publish only statistically significant evidence, creating a scientific record that ...
DOI
Add to ORKG