Confidentiality Guarantee of Tax Information Against the Property of Taxpayer in Management Examination and the State Financial Responsibilities Which Conducted by the Audit Board

This research analysis meant to find out legal consideration used by Constitution judge, whether in accordance or not to legal principles, moral andsocial justice. Therefore,this article tend to  place problems that linked to conflict of norm in term of The Audit Board (BPK) authorities over a good and compliance Taxpayer, and progressive related The Constitutional Court decision of The Audit Board(BPK) authorities of a good and compliance taxpayer in the context of The 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia at its proportion in order tostraightening the consistency of rule of law in Indonesia's legal system, for theshake of completion of logical degree of optimal norm.Intrinsically, decision in the case of petition for Judicial Review of the Act Number 28 of 2007 on the Third Amendment to the Act Number 6 of 1983 on the General Taxation Provisions and Procedures against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, can be made guidance (stelling) to the happening ofopaqueness norm or obscurity norm (vague van normen) which flange at thehappening conflict of norm (geschiljd van normen) related existence of twoimportance of law between The Audit Board (BPK) and Taxpayers which both ofthe same owning of rights which under the aegis of Constitution