This case commentary examines the CJEU’s recent decision in C-621/15 W and Others v Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC [2017] ECR I. This commentary critically examines the decision through the lens of the cultural conflict between law and science. We argue that the CJEU’s decision reflects both a distortion of scientific knowledge and an improper indifference to the legitimate methods by which scientific knowledge is generated in the context of vaccines. These judicial approaches may, the authors argue, inadvertently fuel the vaccine scepticism that is growing across the developed world, and in particular in Europe
[spa] El demandante que reclama una indemnización con base en la legislación de productos defectuoso...
A ruling by the European Court of Justice on a question of health damage caused by vaccines has fuel...
Science is not supposed to tout certainty for its findings. It leaves absolute truth to other fields...
This commentary evaluates the problem in assessing the role of a causal connection between damage an...
Vaccination against hepatitis B has been available since 1982 and is strongly recommended by most he...
The last twenty years have seen a sea-change in the area of proving causation in the toxic tort sett...
Few issues of medical science and tort liability have riled public disagreement like that of vaccine...
The lengthy history of case law covering compulsory vaccination policies state consistently that con...
The views expressed through the media institutions in order to draw an alarm signal on the draft Law...
Abstract: Compensation for damage caused to patients by vaccination is an increasingly prominent is...
Adverse physical reactions to immunizations, 1 although comparatively rare, raise fundamental questi...
Childhood vaccines are extolled for effective prevention of dangerous diseases. However, a persisten...
The author discusses liability for damages for faultless effects of obligatory vaccinations. The le...
The article presents information on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It discusses the U.S. F...
The 2017 Thrower Symposium focused on how law addresses serious global public health challenges. The...
[spa] El demandante que reclama una indemnización con base en la legislación de productos defectuoso...
A ruling by the European Court of Justice on a question of health damage caused by vaccines has fuel...
Science is not supposed to tout certainty for its findings. It leaves absolute truth to other fields...
This commentary evaluates the problem in assessing the role of a causal connection between damage an...
Vaccination against hepatitis B has been available since 1982 and is strongly recommended by most he...
The last twenty years have seen a sea-change in the area of proving causation in the toxic tort sett...
Few issues of medical science and tort liability have riled public disagreement like that of vaccine...
The lengthy history of case law covering compulsory vaccination policies state consistently that con...
The views expressed through the media institutions in order to draw an alarm signal on the draft Law...
Abstract: Compensation for damage caused to patients by vaccination is an increasingly prominent is...
Adverse physical reactions to immunizations, 1 although comparatively rare, raise fundamental questi...
Childhood vaccines are extolled for effective prevention of dangerous diseases. However, a persisten...
The author discusses liability for damages for faultless effects of obligatory vaccinations. The le...
The article presents information on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. It discusses the U.S. F...
The 2017 Thrower Symposium focused on how law addresses serious global public health challenges. The...
[spa] El demandante que reclama una indemnización con base en la legislación de productos defectuoso...
A ruling by the European Court of Justice on a question of health damage caused by vaccines has fuel...
Science is not supposed to tout certainty for its findings. It leaves absolute truth to other fields...