This article is concerned with s. 61 of the Trustee Act 1925. It will analyse the origins, design and modern day operation of the jurisdiction to relieve a trustee from personal liability following a breach of trust. It will revisit the threshold conditions of honesty, reasonableness and fairness and, in the context of mortgage fraud, contend that this exculpatory jurisdiction ought not extend to the bare commercial trust that exists between the mortgagee and its solicitor. Defects, uncertainties and shortcomings associated with s. 61 will also be addressed
Charles Proctor (Partner, Tite & Lewis) reviews the basis in the UK and other jurisdictions for poss...
The United States is experiencing a quiet revolution in the law of trusts. In an effort to compete w...
This article examines the ancient, well attested, but largely unexamined, inherent jurisdiction of t...
Section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925 provides that: “61. Power to relieve trustee from personal liabil...
A personal response to the Law Commission of England and Wales Consultation Paper 171, Trustee Exemp...
The means by which modern flexible discretionary settlements are enforced and the theoretical implic...
This article analyses the recent decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Spread T...
A consideration of breach of trust, liability and professional negligence issues in relation to trus...
In this Article, we hope to show that viewing trust law through a contractual lense may illuminate t...
The duty of loyalty requires a trustee to administer the trust solely in the interest of the benefi...
(Excerpt) Quasi-judicial immunity is best understood as a blessing and a curse. A bankruptcy trustee...
This article examines the ancient, well attested, but largely unexamined, inherent jurisdiction of t...
Article considers how private purpose trusts can be enforced through the notion of having the settlo...
New Zealand and Canadian courts are willing to reduce the liability of a fiduciary for breach of fid...
This article argues that claims to recover trust property from third parties arise in response to a ...
Charles Proctor (Partner, Tite & Lewis) reviews the basis in the UK and other jurisdictions for poss...
The United States is experiencing a quiet revolution in the law of trusts. In an effort to compete w...
This article examines the ancient, well attested, but largely unexamined, inherent jurisdiction of t...
Section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925 provides that: “61. Power to relieve trustee from personal liabil...
A personal response to the Law Commission of England and Wales Consultation Paper 171, Trustee Exemp...
The means by which modern flexible discretionary settlements are enforced and the theoretical implic...
This article analyses the recent decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Spread T...
A consideration of breach of trust, liability and professional negligence issues in relation to trus...
In this Article, we hope to show that viewing trust law through a contractual lense may illuminate t...
The duty of loyalty requires a trustee to administer the trust solely in the interest of the benefi...
(Excerpt) Quasi-judicial immunity is best understood as a blessing and a curse. A bankruptcy trustee...
This article examines the ancient, well attested, but largely unexamined, inherent jurisdiction of t...
Article considers how private purpose trusts can be enforced through the notion of having the settlo...
New Zealand and Canadian courts are willing to reduce the liability of a fiduciary for breach of fid...
This article argues that claims to recover trust property from third parties arise in response to a ...
Charles Proctor (Partner, Tite & Lewis) reviews the basis in the UK and other jurisdictions for poss...
The United States is experiencing a quiet revolution in the law of trusts. In an effort to compete w...
This article examines the ancient, well attested, but largely unexamined, inherent jurisdiction of t...