Common sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological connections between parents and children. Procreators who meet a modest standard of parental competence are believed to have a right to rear the children they brought into the world. I explore various attempts to justify this belief and find most of these attempts lacking. I distinguish between two kinds of biological connections between parents and children: the genetic link and the gestational link. I argue that the second can better justify a right to rear
People who are involuntarily childless need to use assisted reproductive technologies if they want t...
How old is the distinction between the genetic and the gestational parent? Anca Gheaus “suggests” it...
We seek to develop a plausible conception of genetic parenthood, taking a recent discussion by Heidi...
Common sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological co...
Common-sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological co...
In this paper I explore the question of whether gestation can ground parental rights. I consider Anc...
Modern technology has wreaked havoc on conventional and legal notions of parenthood For example, th...
This paper provides an answer to the question why birth parents have a moral right to keep and raise...
Deposited with permission of the author. © 2005 Guiliana Fausta Fuscaldo.What determines parenthood...
Given the rapid advances in assisted reproductive technology, the need for providing a more nuanced ...
Introduction The criticism that the field of assisted reproduction overvalues genetic ties in paren...
Philosophical defenses of parents’ rights typically appeal to the interests of parents, the interest...
With the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, the number of participants in the procreative pr...
It is widely assumed that there is value in the biological tie between parent and child. An implicat...
People who are involuntarily childless need to use assisted reproductive technologies if they want t...
How old is the distinction between the genetic and the gestational parent? Anca Gheaus “suggests” it...
We seek to develop a plausible conception of genetic parenthood, taking a recent discussion by Heidi...
Common sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological co...
Common-sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological co...
In this paper I explore the question of whether gestation can ground parental rights. I consider Anc...
Modern technology has wreaked havoc on conventional and legal notions of parenthood For example, th...
This paper provides an answer to the question why birth parents have a moral right to keep and raise...
Deposited with permission of the author. © 2005 Guiliana Fausta Fuscaldo.What determines parenthood...
Given the rapid advances in assisted reproductive technology, the need for providing a more nuanced ...
Introduction The criticism that the field of assisted reproduction overvalues genetic ties in paren...
Philosophical defenses of parents’ rights typically appeal to the interests of parents, the interest...
With the use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, the number of participants in the procreative pr...
It is widely assumed that there is value in the biological tie between parent and child. An implicat...
People who are involuntarily childless need to use assisted reproductive technologies if they want t...
How old is the distinction between the genetic and the gestational parent? Anca Gheaus “suggests” it...
We seek to develop a plausible conception of genetic parenthood, taking a recent discussion by Heidi...