Add to ORKGWe begin with the hypothetical assumption that Tarski’s 1933 formula ∀ True(x) φ(x) has been defined such that ∀x Tarski:True(x) ↔ Boolean-True. On the basis of this logical premise we formalize the Truth Teller Paradox: "This sentence is true." showing syntactically how self-reference paradox is semantically ungrounded
The denitional feature of Tarski's theory of truth will be the subject of this paper. In fact, addit...
Outline: • Brief history of linguistic self-reference in mathematical logic. • Meaning, achievement ...
At some step in proving the Liar Paradox in natural language, a sentence is derived that seems overd...
We begin with the hypothetical assumption that Tarski’s 1933 formula ∀ True(x) φ(x) has been defined...
Abstract We provide a systematic recipe for eliminating self-reference from a sim-ple language in wh...
I put forward precise and appealing notions of reference, self-reference, and well-foundedness for s...
This paper decomposes the Liar Paradox into its semantic atoms using Meaning Postulates (1952) provi...
Abstract. The classical Liar paradox is as follows We can construct several Liar-like paradoxes, fo...
Self-reference is used to denote any situation in which someone or something refers to itself. Objec...
The aim of this paper is to provide a minimalist axiomatic theory of truth based on the notion of re...
The paper consists of two parts. The first contains the paradox of Truth-teller, i.e. a sentence whi...
Tarski avoids the liar paradox by relativizing truth and falsehood to particular languages and forbi...
219 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.This thesis is a study of the...
Within the (Haskell Curry) notion of a formal system we complete Tarski's formal correctness: ∀x Tr...
Both Tarski and Gödel “prove” that provability can diverge from Truth. When we boil their claim down...
The denitional feature of Tarski's theory of truth will be the subject of this paper. In fact, addit...
Outline: • Brief history of linguistic self-reference in mathematical logic. • Meaning, achievement ...
At some step in proving the Liar Paradox in natural language, a sentence is derived that seems overd...
We begin with the hypothetical assumption that Tarski’s 1933 formula ∀ True(x) φ(x) has been defined...
Abstract We provide a systematic recipe for eliminating self-reference from a sim-ple language in wh...
I put forward precise and appealing notions of reference, self-reference, and well-foundedness for s...
This paper decomposes the Liar Paradox into its semantic atoms using Meaning Postulates (1952) provi...
Abstract. The classical Liar paradox is as follows We can construct several Liar-like paradoxes, fo...
Self-reference is used to denote any situation in which someone or something refers to itself. Objec...
The aim of this paper is to provide a minimalist axiomatic theory of truth based on the notion of re...
The paper consists of two parts. The first contains the paradox of Truth-teller, i.e. a sentence whi...
Tarski avoids the liar paradox by relativizing truth and falsehood to particular languages and forbi...
219 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.This thesis is a study of the...
Within the (Haskell Curry) notion of a formal system we complete Tarski's formal correctness: ∀x Tr...
Both Tarski and Gödel “prove” that provability can diverge from Truth. When we boil their claim down...
The denitional feature of Tarski's theory of truth will be the subject of this paper. In fact, addit...
Outline: • Brief history of linguistic self-reference in mathematical logic. • Meaning, achievement ...
At some step in proving the Liar Paradox in natural language, a sentence is derived that seems overd...