Add to ORKGA short (about 1,000 words) overview of adjudication, describing the standard view (judges should just apply the law, when possible) and two goal-oriented views: wealth maximization and the maximization of well-being – i.e., utilitarian adjudication
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Engaging with the literature on courts and judicial politics, this article argues that one should d...
A short (about 1,000 words) overview of adjudication, describing the standard view (judges should ju...
In the process of adjudication, judges are required to assert propositions that answer the issues a ...
Up until today the way judges perceive has received little attention in legal discourse. Adjudicatio...
Adjudication is interpretation: Adjudication is the process by which a judge comes to understand and...
This article addresses three different dimensions in the realm of civil adjudication. These dimensi...
The thesis focuses on Judicial Review of Legislation, exploring—with the aid of Robert Brandom’s inf...
Legal systems make law in one of two ways: by abstracting general principles from the decisions made...
Legal systems make law in one of two ways: by abstracting general principles from the decisions made...
One aspiration of an analytic jurisprudential theory is to provide an account of how legal obligatio...
Almost every interesting dispute that arises under the law is the product of disagreement among reas...
Judicial opinions in securities fraud class actions frequently do not conform to standard theories o...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Engaging with the literature on courts and judicial politics, this article argues that one should d...
A short (about 1,000 words) overview of adjudication, describing the standard view (judges should ju...
In the process of adjudication, judges are required to assert propositions that answer the issues a ...
Up until today the way judges perceive has received little attention in legal discourse. Adjudicatio...
Adjudication is interpretation: Adjudication is the process by which a judge comes to understand and...
This article addresses three different dimensions in the realm of civil adjudication. These dimensi...
The thesis focuses on Judicial Review of Legislation, exploring—with the aid of Robert Brandom’s inf...
Legal systems make law in one of two ways: by abstracting general principles from the decisions made...
Legal systems make law in one of two ways: by abstracting general principles from the decisions made...
One aspiration of an analytic jurisprudential theory is to provide an account of how legal obligatio...
Almost every interesting dispute that arises under the law is the product of disagreement among reas...
Judicial opinions in securities fraud class actions frequently do not conform to standard theories o...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
How should judges decide the cases presented to them? In our system the answer is, “according to law...
Engaging with the literature on courts and judicial politics, this article argues that one should d...